Use of vaginal mesh in the face of recent FDA warnings and litigation

被引:41
作者
Mucowski, Sara J. [1 ]
Jurnalov, Catalin [2 ]
Phelps, John Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Reprod Endocrinol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
informed consent; lawsuit; mesh; pelvic organ prolapse; stress urinary incontinence; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; GRAFT USE; FUTURE; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.060
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Choosing to use mesh in vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence is perplexing in the face of recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings. In October 2008, the FDA alerted practitioners to complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh. Litigation is another concern. A Google search of "transvaginal mesh" results in numerous hits for plaintiff attorneys seeking patients with complications related to use of mesh. In light of a recent decision by the US Supreme Court and strategies by manufactures of medical devices to escape liability, it is imperative that gynecologic surgeons using transvaginal mesh document proper informed consent in the medical records. The purpose of this commentary is not to deter gynecologic surgeons from using transvaginal mesh when appropriate, but to provide an overview of current medical-legal controversies and stress the importance of documenting informed consent.
引用
收藏
页码:103.e1 / 103.e4
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Abdel-Fattah, M. ;
Ramsay, I. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (01) :22-30
[2]  
ACOG Committee on Ethics, 2006, Obstet Gynecol, V108, P1589
[3]   Clinical implications of the biology of grafts: conclusions of the 2005 IUGA Grafts Roundtable [J].
Davila, G. Willy ;
Drutz, Harold ;
Deprest, Jan .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2006, 17 (Suppl 1) :S51-S55
[4]   Pelvic organ prolapse: demographics and future growth prospects [J].
Drutz, Harold P. ;
Alarab, May .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2006, 17 (Suppl 1) :S6-S9
[5]   Biologic and synthetic graft use in pelvic surgery: A review [J].
Jakus, Sharon M. ;
Shapiro, Alex ;
Hall, Cynthia D. .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2008, 63 (04) :253-266
[6]   Midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence [J].
Kane, Amy R. ;
Nager, Charles W. .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 51 (01) :124-135
[7]  
Kapp MarshallB., 2006, J. Health Biomedical L, V2, P1
[8]   Clinical Practice Guidelines on Vaginal Graft Use From the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons [J].
Murphy, Miles .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (05) :1123-1130
[9]  
*NIH CLIN EX, 2008, 267 NIH CLIN EXC
[10]   Lessons from the past: directions for the future - Do new marketed surgical procedures and grafts produce ethical, personal liability, and legal concerns for physicians? [J].
Ostergard, Donald R. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (06) :591-598