Shoulder proprioception: How is it measured and is it reliable? A systematic review

被引:69
作者
Ager, Amanda L. [1 ,2 ]
Roy, Jean-Sebastien [1 ,2 ]
Mus, Marianne Roos M. [1 ,2 ]
Belley, Amelie Fournier [1 ,2 ]
Cools, Ann [4 ]
Hebert, Luc J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil & Social Integr, Rehabil Inst, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Laval Univ, Fac Med, Dept Rehabil, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Laval Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Shoulder; Proprioception; Joint position sense; Kinesthesia; Reliability; Psychometric properties; Systematic review; JOINT POSITION SENSE; SENSORIMOTOR SYSTEM; MUSCLE FATIGUE; UPPER-LIMB; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; PAIN; KINESTHESIA; MOVEMENT; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Systematic review. Introduction: Constituents of proprioception include our awareness of the position (joint position sense ([JPS]) and motion (kinesthesia) of our limbs in space. Proprioceptive deficits are associated with musculoskeletal disorders but remain a challenge to quantify, particularly at the shoulder. Purpose of the Study: To report the psychometric values of validity, reliability, and responsiveness for shoulder JPS and/or kinesthesia protocols. Methods: A review of 5 databases was conducted from inception to July 2016 for studies reporting a psychometric property of a shoulder proprioception protocol. The included studies were evaluated using the QualSyst checklist and COSMIN 4-point scale. Results: Twenty-one studies were included, yielding 407 participants and 553 evaluated shoulders (n). The included studies support excellent methodological scores using the QualSyst checklist (88.1 +/- 9.9%) and good psychometric scores with the COSMIN for reliability (71.1%) and moderate-to-low quality score (50%) for criterion validity. Weighted average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intrarater reliability were highest for passive JPS and kinesthesia, ICC = 0.92 +/- 0.07 (n = 214) and ICC = 0.92 +/- 0.04 (n = 74), respectively. The most reliable movement and tool are internal rotation at 90 of abduction, ICC = 0.88 +/- 0.01 (n = 53), and the dynamometer, ICC = 0.92 +/- 0.88 (n = 225). Only 2 studies quantify an aspect of validity and no responsiveness indices were reported among the included studies. Conclusion: Based on the results of the included studies, the evaluation of shoulder proprioception is most reliable when using a passive protocol with an isokinetic dynamometer for internal rotation at 90 of shoulder abduction. Standardized protocols addressing the psychometric properties of shoulder proprioception measures are needed. (C) 2017 Hanley & Belfus, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 231
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   SHOULDER KINESTHESIA IN HEALTHY UNILATERAL ATHLETES PARTICIPATING IN UPPER EXTREMITY SPORTS [J].
ALLEGRUCCI, M ;
WHITNEY, SL ;
LEPHART, SM ;
IRRGANG, JJ ;
FU, FH .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 21 (04) :220-226
[2]   The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review [J].
Aman, Joshua E. ;
Elangovan, Naveen ;
Yeh, I-Ling ;
Konczak, Juergen .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 8
[3]   Impaired Joint Proprioception at Higher Shoulder Elevations in Chronic Rotator Cuff Pathology [J].
Anderson, Vincent B. ;
Wee, Elin .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (07) :1146-1151
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], MAN THER
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1977, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J SPORT REHABIL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1906, The integrative action of the nervous system
[9]  
[Anonymous], ASIAN J SPORTS MED
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. (HTA Initiative #13), DOI DOI 10.7939/R37M04F16