Evaluation of operational system structures based on reliability data

被引:1
作者
Polansky, Alan M. [1 ]
Ryu, Duchwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Northern Illinois Univ, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
关键词
Bayes factor; Bayesian model selection; observed confidence levels; parametric bootstrap; BINOMIAL SUBSYSTEMS; SERIES;
D O I
10.1002/qre.2940
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Systems of components have a structure that plays an important role in determining how the reliability of the individual components relates to the reliability of the system. The system reliability can be computed from component reliabilities using results from basic probability theory in the simplest case with all of the components assumed to act independently of one another. However, in the case of dependence, such calculations can be much more involved. When reliability data have been independently collected on both the system and each component in the system, it can be difficult to model any possible dependence between components. Established methods use the known structure of a system, along with these data, to assess whether the reliability of the individual components are mutually independent. In this paper, we expand this methodology to include an assessment of the type of dependence that may exist between the components. This is based on finding the system structure that would most likely produce the observed reliability data, under independence. In the frequentist setting, the likelihood approach is used to find these structures and an observed confidence measure is used to assess the strength of the statistical evidence in favor of each possible structure. In the Bayesian setting, posterior probabilities along with Bayes factors are used. An example demonstrates how these methods can be used in an applied setting.
引用
收藏
页码:3661 / 3672
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Evaluation of Multicenter Registry Data [J].
Schraven, Sebastian P. ;
Mlynski, Robert .
LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2019, 98 :S73-+
[22]   A computational Bayesian approach to dependency assessment in system reliability [J].
Yontay, Petek ;
Pan, Rong .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 152 :104-114
[23]   Data mining of association structures to model consumer behaviour [J].
Giudici, P ;
Passerone, G .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2002, 38 (04) :533-541
[24]   Evaluation of clear-sky and satellite-derived irradiance data for determining the degradation of photovoltaic system performance [J].
Marion, Bill .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2021, 223 :376-383
[25]   A Cocktail of Bidirectional Tests for Power Symmetry and Repairable System Reliability [J].
Ho, Chih-Hsiang ;
Koo, Sung Keun ;
Bhaduri, Moinak ;
Zhou, Libo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2024, 73 (01) :384-398
[26]   Fiducial Lower Confidence Limit of Reliability for a Power Distribution System [J].
Cai, Xia ;
Yan, Liang ;
Li, Yan ;
Wu, Yutong .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (23)
[27]   Hypothesis Testing for Mitigation of Operational Infeasibility on Distribution System Under Rising Renewable Penetration [J].
Weng, Yu ;
Ly, Sel ;
Wang, Peng ;
Nguyen, Hung Dinh .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2023, 14 (02) :876-891
[28]   Bayesian software reliability models based on martingale processes [J].
Basu, S ;
Ebrahimi, N .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2003, 45 (02) :150-158
[29]   Relationship of ISO 9001: 2000 quality system certification with operational and business performance A survey in Australia and New Zealand-based manufacturing and service companies [J].
Feng, Mei ;
Terziovski, Mile ;
Samson, Danny .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 19 (01) :22-37
[30]   Best Fit versus Default Distribution and the Impact on the Reliability over the Design Lifetime of Hydraulic Structures [J].
Krimil, Farida ;
Bouchahm, Nora ;
Tebbi, Fatima Zohra .
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (01) :10175-10180