The impact of consumer archetypes on online purchase decision-making processes and outcomes: A behavioural process perspective

被引:43
|
作者
Karimi, Sahar [1 ]
Holland, Christopher P. [2 ,3 ]
Papamichail, K. Nadia [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Management Sch, Chatham St, Liverpool L69 7ZH, Merseyside, England
[2] Loughborough Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[3] Munster Univ, Dept Informat Syst, Munster, Germany
[4] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Booth St East, Manchester M13 9SS, Lancs, England
关键词
Consumer decision-making; Purchase processes; Process modelling; Consumer satisfaction; Maximization tendency; Product knowledge; INFORMATION SEARCH; SATISFACTION-DISSATISFACTION; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; CHOICE-PROCESS; CUSTOMIZATION; ACQUISITION; DIMENSIONS; STRATEGIES; MAXIMIZERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.038
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates differences in online purchase behaviour between consumer archetypes. It shows how consumers' decision-making styles and product knowledge define distinct archetypal behaviour that shapes online purchase processes and affects decision-related outcomes: satisfaction with choice; and satisfaction with process. The first study proposes a new modelling approach that creates an accurate representation of decision-making behaviour. Using this method, a clear structure that underlies seemingly chaotic purchase processes is identified. This structure offers an analytical tool capable of capturing behavioural differences between archetypes. The results show that decision-making style and product knowledge affect the structure and complexity of decision-making processes. The second study found that consumers with higher product knowledge are more satisfied with decision-making process and that this relationship is mediated by the duration of decision-making. Maximizers are more satisfied with their choice than satisficers, and this relationship is mediated by the number of alternatives that are evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 82
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of digital household budgets on online purchase decision-making processes
    Skwara, Florian
    Wienert, Luca
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 23 (04) : 1671 - 1700
  • [2] The effect of prior knowledge and decision-making style on the online purchase decision-making process: A typology of consumer shopping behaviour
    Karimi, Sahar
    Papamichail, K. Nadia
    Holland, Christopher P.
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2015, 77 : 137 - 147
  • [3] Psychological Processes in Financial Decision-making: A Consumer Perspective
    Eisenstein, Eric M.
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL 33, 2006, 33 : 403 - 405
  • [4] A Model of Consumer's Purchase Decision-making
    Li Min
    Zhu Jing
    Wang Xin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIBER SOCIETY 2009 SPRING CONFERENCE, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 1124 - 1127
  • [5] Purchase decision-making of the consumer in a retail store
    Richterová, K
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2001, 49 (06): : 1083 - 1095
  • [6] Consumer decision-making styles in food purchase
    Thomas, Terrence
    Gunden, Cihat
    Gray, Benjamin
    AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2013, 24 (04): : 27 - 30
  • [7] Consumer decision-making styles in food purchase
    Thomas, T., 1600, TeknoScienze, Viale Brianza,22, Milano, 20127, Italy (24):
  • [8] The Impact of Email Marketing, Online Advertising and social media On the Consumer Decision-Making Process
    Desku, Behrije Ramaj
    Sadrija, Thellenza Latifi
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2023, 24 (194): : 313 - 318
  • [9] Exploring Gender Differences in Online Consumer Purchase Decision Making: An Online Product Presentation Perspective
    Lin, Xiaolin
    Featherman, Mauricio
    Brooks, Stoney L.
    Hajli, Nick
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2019, 21 (05) : 1187 - 1201
  • [10] Exploring Gender Differences in Online Consumer Purchase Decision Making: An Online Product Presentation Perspective
    Xiaolin Lin
    Mauricio Featherman
    Stoney L. Brooks
    Nick Hajli
    Information Systems Frontiers, 2019, 21 : 1187 - 1201