The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:10
|
作者
Jacob, Kevin C. [1 ]
Patel, Madhav R. [1 ]
Collins, Andrew P. [1 ]
Ribot, Max A. [1 ]
Pawlowski, Hanna [1 ]
Prabhu, Michael C. [1 ]
Vanjani, Nisheka N. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Lumbar fusion; Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient satisfaction; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SPINE SURGERY; LEG PAIN; CLINIMETRICS CORNER; DISEASE; SENSITIVITY; SCORES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.051
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion stratified by preoperative disability. METHODS: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions were grouped by preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score: ODI <41 or ODI >= 41. PROMs administered pre/postoperatively included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF), visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg, ODI, and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS)/12-Item Short-Form Mental Composite Score (SF-12 MCS). Satisfaction scores were collected for VAS back/leg and ODI. Coarsened exact match controlled for differences between cohorts. T tests compared mean PROMs and postoperative improvement/satisfaction between cohorts. Simple logistic regression compared MCID achievement. RESULTS: After coarsened exact matching, there were 118 patients in the ODI <= 41 and 377 patients in the ODI >41 cohort. The ODI >41 cohort saw greater postoperative inpatient VAS pain score and narcotic consumption on days 0/1 (P < 0.018, all). PROMs differed between cohorts: PROMIS-PF, SF-12 PCS, ODI, VAS back/leg at all postoperative time points and SF-12 MCS at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year (P < 0.045, all). Patients in the ODI >41 cohort demonstrated greater proportion achieving MCID for ODI at all postoperative time points and for SF-12 MCS 6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year (P < 0.040, all). The ODI <= 41 cohort demonstrated greater MCID achievement for overall PROMIS-PF and SF-12 PCS 6 months (P < 0.047, all). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in the ODI <= 41 cohort for VAS leg 6 weeks/12 weeks, VAS back 6 weeks/12 weeks, and ODI all postoperative time points (P < 0.048, all). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative disability associated with worse postoperative PROMs and patient satisfaction for disability, back/leg pain at multiple time points. MCID achievement rates across cohorts were similar for most PROMs at most postoperative time points. Patients with severe disability may have unrealistic expectations for surgical benefits, influencing corresponding postoperative satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:E334 / E346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Issa, Kimona
    Shafa, Eiman
    Pourtaheri, Sina
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki S.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [32] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Won-chul
    Park, Jeong-Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 85 : 236 - 243
  • [33] Does Gender Influence Postoperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Patel, Dil, V
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Ganda, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (02): : E107 - E111
  • [34] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Badlani, Neil
    Yu, Elizabeth
    Kreitz, Tyler
    Khan, Safdar
    Kurd, Mark F.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (02): : 62 - 64
  • [35] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis in patients with significant obesity
    Lau, Darryl
    Ziewacz, John
    Park, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (01) : 80 - 83
  • [36] Preoperative Resilience and Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion
    Daher, Mohammad
    Alsoof, Daniel
    Balmaceno-Criss, Mariah
    Kuharski, Michael J.
    Criddle, Sarah L.
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 186 : E531 - E538
  • [37] Impact of Obesity Severity on Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01): : E267 - E273
  • [38] Does the Predominant Pain Location Influence Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction, and Return to Work After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion For Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
    Goh, Graham S.
    Yue, Wai-Mun
    Guo, Chang Ming
    Tan, Seang-Beng
    Chen, John Li-Tat
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01): : E143 - E149
  • [39] The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lawton, C. D.
    Smith, Z. A.
    Barnawi, A.
    Fessler, R. G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 55 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [40] Do Diabetic Patients Have Poorer Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Thever, Yogen
    Lincoln, Liow Ming Han
    Gatot, Cheryl
    Cheong, Reuben Soh hee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 (05) : 708 - 714