The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:10
|
作者
Jacob, Kevin C. [1 ]
Patel, Madhav R. [1 ]
Collins, Andrew P. [1 ]
Ribot, Max A. [1 ]
Pawlowski, Hanna [1 ]
Prabhu, Michael C. [1 ]
Vanjani, Nisheka N. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Lumbar fusion; Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient satisfaction; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SPINE SURGERY; LEG PAIN; CLINIMETRICS CORNER; DISEASE; SENSITIVITY; SCORES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.051
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion stratified by preoperative disability. METHODS: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions were grouped by preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score: ODI <41 or ODI >= 41. PROMs administered pre/postoperatively included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF), visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg, ODI, and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS)/12-Item Short-Form Mental Composite Score (SF-12 MCS). Satisfaction scores were collected for VAS back/leg and ODI. Coarsened exact match controlled for differences between cohorts. T tests compared mean PROMs and postoperative improvement/satisfaction between cohorts. Simple logistic regression compared MCID achievement. RESULTS: After coarsened exact matching, there were 118 patients in the ODI <= 41 and 377 patients in the ODI >41 cohort. The ODI >41 cohort saw greater postoperative inpatient VAS pain score and narcotic consumption on days 0/1 (P < 0.018, all). PROMs differed between cohorts: PROMIS-PF, SF-12 PCS, ODI, VAS back/leg at all postoperative time points and SF-12 MCS at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year (P < 0.045, all). Patients in the ODI >41 cohort demonstrated greater proportion achieving MCID for ODI at all postoperative time points and for SF-12 MCS 6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year (P < 0.040, all). The ODI <= 41 cohort demonstrated greater MCID achievement for overall PROMIS-PF and SF-12 PCS 6 months (P < 0.047, all). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in the ODI <= 41 cohort for VAS leg 6 weeks/12 weeks, VAS back 6 weeks/12 weeks, and ODI all postoperative time points (P < 0.048, all). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative disability associated with worse postoperative PROMs and patient satisfaction for disability, back/leg pain at multiple time points. MCID achievement rates across cohorts were similar for most PROMs at most postoperative time points. Patients with severe disability may have unrealistic expectations for surgical benefits, influencing corresponding postoperative satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:E334 / E346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [22] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [23] Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anteriorly Placed Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    McCurdy, Michael A.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Fras, Sebastian I.
    Purtill, William
    Millar, Ben
    Kolowrat, Samantha
    Issa, Tariq Z.
    D'Antonio, Nicholas D.
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Kaye, Ian David
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (15) : 1078 - 1084
  • [24] The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function to Predict Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yoo, Joon S.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Brundage, Thomas S.
    Singh, Kern
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (23) : E1388 - E1395
  • [25] Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lordotic Versus Non-lordotic Static Interbody Devices in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Longitudinal Comparative Cohort Study
    Lawless, Michael H.
    Claus, Chad F.
    Tong, Doris
    Jordan, Noah
    Dosanjh, Amarpal
    Hanson, Connor T.
    Carr, Daniel A.
    Houseman, Clifford M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [26] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [27] The Influence of Preoperative Mental Health on PROMIS Physical Function Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yoo, Joon S.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Brundage, Thomas S.
    Mogilevsky, Franchesca A.
    Shah, Holly C.
    Mehraban, Nasima
    Singh, Kern
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (04) : E236 - E243
  • [28] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [29] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Elboghdady, Islam M.
    Naqvi, Abbas
    Jorgenson, Anton Y.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Singh, Kern
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [30] Patient Perceptions of Iliac Crest Bone Grafting in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Kheche, Benjamin
    Patel, Dil, V
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Ganda, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (10): : 430 - 434