The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:10
|
作者
Jacob, Kevin C. [1 ]
Patel, Madhav R. [1 ]
Collins, Andrew P. [1 ]
Ribot, Max A. [1 ]
Pawlowski, Hanna [1 ]
Prabhu, Michael C. [1 ]
Vanjani, Nisheka N. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Lumbar fusion; Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient satisfaction; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SPINE SURGERY; LEG PAIN; CLINIMETRICS CORNER; DISEASE; SENSITIVITY; SCORES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.051
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion stratified by preoperative disability. METHODS: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions were grouped by preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score: ODI <41 or ODI >= 41. PROMs administered pre/postoperatively included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF), visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg, ODI, and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS)/12-Item Short-Form Mental Composite Score (SF-12 MCS). Satisfaction scores were collected for VAS back/leg and ODI. Coarsened exact match controlled for differences between cohorts. T tests compared mean PROMs and postoperative improvement/satisfaction between cohorts. Simple logistic regression compared MCID achievement. RESULTS: After coarsened exact matching, there were 118 patients in the ODI <= 41 and 377 patients in the ODI >41 cohort. The ODI >41 cohort saw greater postoperative inpatient VAS pain score and narcotic consumption on days 0/1 (P < 0.018, all). PROMs differed between cohorts: PROMIS-PF, SF-12 PCS, ODI, VAS back/leg at all postoperative time points and SF-12 MCS at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year (P < 0.045, all). Patients in the ODI >41 cohort demonstrated greater proportion achieving MCID for ODI at all postoperative time points and for SF-12 MCS 6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year (P < 0.040, all). The ODI <= 41 cohort demonstrated greater MCID achievement for overall PROMIS-PF and SF-12 PCS 6 months (P < 0.047, all). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in the ODI <= 41 cohort for VAS leg 6 weeks/12 weeks, VAS back 6 weeks/12 weeks, and ODI all postoperative time points (P < 0.048, all). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative disability associated with worse postoperative PROMs and patient satisfaction for disability, back/leg pain at multiple time points. MCID achievement rates across cohorts were similar for most PROMs at most postoperative time points. Patients with severe disability may have unrealistic expectations for surgical benefits, influencing corresponding postoperative satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:E334 / E346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients
    Lau, Darryl
    Khan, Adam
    Terman, Samuel W.
    Yee, Timothy
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
  • [22] The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function to Predict Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yoo, Joon S.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Brundage, Thomas S.
    Singh, Kern
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (23) : E1388 - E1395
  • [23] Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Park, Chun-Kun
    Hur, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2019, 59 (06) : 222 - 230
  • [24] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [25] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [26] Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    Parker, Scott L.
    Mummaneni, Praveen
    Knightly, John
    Pfortmiller, Deborah
    Foley, Kevin
    Asher, Anthony L.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (07) : 922 - 932
  • [27] Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?
    Morse, Kyle W.
    Alluri, Ram K.
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Urakawa, Hikari
    Mok, Jung Kee
    Virk, Sohrab S.
    Sheha, Evan D.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (04) : 570 - 577
  • [28] History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (03) : 479 - 491
  • [29] Patient Perceptions of Iliac Crest Bone Grafting in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Kheche, Benjamin
    Patel, Dil, V
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Ganda, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (10): : 430 - 434
  • [30] Patient expectations impact patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after lumbar fusion
    Zhang, Hanci
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Potts, Eric A.
    Jazini, Ehsan
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (02) : 273 - 277