Neonatal outcome of second twins depending on presentation and mode of delivery

被引:14
作者
Bjelic-Radisic, Vesna [1 ]
Pristauz, Gunda [1 ]
Haas, Josef [1 ]
Giuliani, Albrecht [1 ]
Tamussino, Karl [1 ]
Bader, Arnim [1 ]
Lang, Uwe [1 ]
Schlembach, Dietmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, A-8036 Graz, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1375/twin.10.3.521
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Our objective was to examine the neonatal outcome of second twins depending on presentation and mode of delivery. Using a database we analyzed the short-term neonatal outcome in twin pregnancies offered a trial of labor with special emphasis on the second twin depending on presentation and mode of delivery. Neonatal outcome was evaluated by Apgar scores, umbilical cord blood pH values, and perinatal or neonatal morbidity and mortality. Overall, in 219 (78%) of 281 pregnancies successful vaginal birth (VB) of both twins (VB-VB) was possible, 48 (17%) women had to be delivered by cesarean section (CS) of both twins (CS-CS), and in 14 (5%) women the second twin had to be delivered by CS after VB of the first twin (VB-CS). Successful VB was most common for vertex-vertex (V/V; n = 171, 82%) and vertex-nonvertex (n = 48, 75%) presentation (V/NV). Twins delivered by VB-CS had the lowest values for pH art (p = .006) and pHven (p = .010). pHart less than or equal to 7.00 values occurred only in second twins delivered VB-VB or VB-CS. Lower Apgar scores of the second twin occurred more frequently in the VB-CS and in the VB-VB than in the CS-CS groups (ps < .05). Lower levels of pHart (p = .002) and frequency of pHart less than or equal to 7.00 occurred more often in nonvertex second twins than in vertex second twins (p < .022). The high CS rate in V/NV presentation and the significantly worse perinatal short-term outcome of NV second twins after VB of the first twin underline that randomized studies are necessary to evaluate the best delivery mode for V/NV twins.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 527
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Retrospective study of outcome on vaginal and abdominal delivery in twin pregnancy in which twin 1 is presenting by the breech [J].
Abu-Heija, AT ;
Ziadeh, S ;
Abukteish, F ;
Obeidat, A .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1998, 261 (02) :71-73
[2]   TWIN DELIVERY - INFLUENCE OF THE PRESENTATION AND METHOD OF DELIVERY ON THE 2ND TWIN [J].
ADAM, C ;
ALLEN, AC ;
BASKETT, TF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (01) :23-27
[3]   INTRAPARTUM MANAGEMENT OF TWIN GESTATION [J].
ADAMS, DM ;
CHERVENAK, FA .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 33 (01) :52-60
[4]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 2004, OBSTET GYNECOL, V104, P869
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V64, P323
[6]   Randomised controlled trial for twin delivery [J].
Barrett, JFR .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7386) :448-448
[7]   Twin delivery [J].
Barrett, JFR ;
Ritchie, WK .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (01) :43-56
[8]   Delivery of breech first twins: A multicenter retrospective study [J].
Blickstein, I ;
Goldman, RD ;
Kupferminc, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (01) :37-42
[9]   The effect of mode of delivery and gestational age on neonatal outcome of the non-cephalic-presenting second twin [J].
Caukwell, S ;
Murphy, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (05) :1356-1361
[10]  
CETRULO CL, 1986, SEMIN PERINATOL, V10, P39