Quality control of cancer screening examination procedures in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial

被引:20
|
作者
Weissfeld, JL
Fagerstrom, RM
O'Brien, B
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Prevent, Biometry Res Grp, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Westat Inc, Rockville, MD USA
来源
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS | 2000年 / 21卷 / 06期
关键词
quality control; cancer screening; procedures; data analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00094-5
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Investigators for the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial describe quality control procedures for the digital rectal examination, ovarian palpation examination, transvaginal ultrasound, chest X-ray, and flexible sigmoidoscopy. These cancer screening tests are subjective and difficult to standardize. PLCO quality control procedures aim to measure and, where possible, reduce variation, across examiner and screening center, with respect to cancer screening test performance. Initial protocols stressed examiner qualifications, experience, and training; equipment specifications; examination procedures; and definitions for positive tests. The PLCO quality assurance subcommittee developed a final quality assurance plan, which included central approval and registration of PLCO examiners, direct observation of screening test performance during periodic site visits by the National Cancer Institute and coordinating center auditors, periodic analysis of screening test data, and procedures for independently duplicating or reviewing selected examinations. For each modality, the periodic data analyses examine the test-positive and the test-inadequate proportions and aim to identify divergent centers or examiners. Procedures for duplicating examinations specify feasible sample sizes for precise estimates of agreement between examiners, at each center, for each screening test modality, and over a 1-year period. These quality control procedures will help characterize the consistency and reliability of the PLCO cancer screening tests. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:390S-399S (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 2000.
引用
收藏
页码:390S / 399S
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contemporary progress in ovarian cancer screening
    Walsh C.S.
    Karlan B.Y.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2007, 9 (6) : 485 - 493
  • [32] SCREENING FOR EARLY OVARIAN-CANCER
    TAYLOR, KJW
    SCHWARTZ, PE
    RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [33] Screening for Ovarian Cancer: A Reality Check
    Ricci, Stephanie
    Shih, Ie-Ming
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 2 (02): : 73 - 75
  • [34] Analysis of colorectal cancer screening regimens
    Clemen R.T.
    Lacke C.J.
    Health Care Management Science, 2001, 4 (4) : 257 - 267
  • [35] Screening for Ovarian Cancer: A Reality Check
    Stephanie Ricci
    Ie-Ming Shih
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2013, 2 (2) : 73 - 75
  • [36] Colorectal Cancer Screening and Social Needs
    Franklin, Isabelle R.
    Gambatese, Rebecca
    Duggan, Mark C.
    Green, Beverly B.
    Nocon, Robert S.
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Hahn, Erin E.
    Honda, Stacey A.
    Koplan, Kate
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Steiner, Claudia A.
    Ngo-Metzger, Quyen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2025, 37 (05) : 868 - 887
  • [37] Missed Opportunities for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Shah, Nirav R.
    Aragones, Abraham
    Gany, Francesca
    JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE STUDIES, 2009, 7 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [38] Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in women
    Krishnan, Sandeep
    Wolf, Jacqueline L.
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 7 (02) : 213 - 226
  • [39] Impact of bowel cancer screening on the management of colorectal cancer
    Hwang, M. -J.
    Evans, T.
    Lawrence, G.
    Karandikar, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (06) : 450 - 458
  • [40] Screening for prostate cancer: an updated review
    Marta, Gustavo Nader
    Hanna, Samir Abdallah
    Fernandes da Silva, Joao Luis
    Carvalho, Heloisa de Andrade
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2013, 13 (01) : 101 - 108