Recurrent urinary tract infection in girls: do urodynamic, behavioral and functional abnormalities play a role?

被引:0
|
作者
Rudaitis, Sarunas [1 ]
Pundziene, Birute [1 ]
Jievaltas, Mindaugas [2 ]
Uktveris, Rimantas [1 ]
Kevelaitis, Egidijus [3 ]
机构
[1] Kaunas Univ Med, Clin Children Dis, LT-50009 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Kaunas Univ Med, Urol Clin, LT-50009 Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Kaunas Univ Med, Dept Physiol, LT-50009 Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
Girls; Incontinence; Risk factors; Urinary tract infection; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; RISK-FACTORS; VOIDING DYSFUNCTION; CHILDREN; HABITS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CONTINENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To determine urodynamic, behavioral and functional abnormalities predisposing to recurrent urinary tract infection in 5- to 17-year-old girls. Methods: A prospective case-control study was carried out. A total of 148 girls met inclusion criteria. They received a careful evaluation including complete history, voiding-drinking diary, bowel questionnaire, physical investigation, sonography, voiding cystourethrogram and urodynamic investigation. Results: In a multivariate model, independent risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infection included age <= 6.5 years at first urinary tract infection (odds ratio [OR] =0.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.85-0.98), abnormal voiding frequency (OR=5.3; 95% CI, 1.1-26.2), voiding postponement (OR=3.8; 95% CI, 1.4-10.1), poor fluid intake (OR=9.2; 95% CI, 2.5-33.6) and residual urine volume of > 20 mL (OR=1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1). Conclusions: Independent risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infection were age <= 6.5 years at first urinary tract infection, abnormal voiding frequency, voiding postponement, poor fluid intake and residual urine. Our results indicate that none of the urodynamic factors was significantly associated with recurrence of urinary tact infection in girls.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 773
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Family history and behavioral abnormalities in girls with recurrent urinary tract infections: A controlled study
    Stauffer, CM
    van der Weg, B
    Donadini, R
    Ramelli, GP
    Marchand, S
    Bianchetti, MG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) : 1663 - 1665
  • [2] Childhood Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Southern Thailand
    Vachvanichsanong, Prayong
    Dissaneewate, Pornsak
    McNeil, Edward
    RENAL FAILURE, 2013, 35 (01) : 66 - 71
  • [3] Prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in children
    Williams, Gabrielle
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 22 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [4] Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection After Midurethral Sling: A Retrospective Study
    Hammett, Jessica
    Lukman, Revana
    Oakes, Megan
    Whitcomb, Emily L.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (06): : 438 - 441
  • [5] Evaluation of sacral dimple association with urodynamic findings in children with recurrent urinary tract infection
    Emami, Elham
    Sharifian, Mostafa
    Mohkam, Masoumeh
    Oroojeni, Atrin
    Dorali, Reza
    Javanmard, Pedram
    JOURNAL OF RENAL INJURY PREVENTION, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [6] Investigation of girls with urinary tract infection
    Piepsz, A
    Ham, HR
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 1998, 12 (04) : 338 - 339
  • [7] The risk factors for recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection and renal scarring in children with functional urinary incontinence
    Cetin, Nuran
    Kavaz Tufan, Asli
    Tokar, Baran
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2021, 13 (01) : 160 - 167
  • [8] Association of First Urinary Tract Infection in Children with Urinary Tract Abnormalities
    Ishaqui, Habibullah
    Khan, Syed Liaquat Ali
    Mohammad, Fazal
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2015, 9 (03): : 969 - 971
  • [9] What to do about recurrent urinary tract infections
    Klussmann, Daniel
    Wagenlehner, Florian
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2022, 147 (17) : 1140 - 1144
  • [10] What to do about recurrent urinary tract infections
    Fassl, Daniel
    Wagenlehner, Florian
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2021, 52 (03) : 255 - 259