Prediction of methane hydrate formation conditions in salt water using machine learning algorithms

被引:47
作者
Xu, Hongfei [1 ]
Jiao, Zeren [1 ]
Zhang, Zhuoran [1 ]
Huffman, Mitchell [1 ]
Wang, Qingsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Mary Kay O Connor Proc Safety Ctr, Artie McFerrin Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Gas hydrate; Phase equilibrium; Electrolyte solution; Machine learning; PHASE-EQUILIBRIA; AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS; CARBON-DIOXIDE; SUPPRESSION TEMPERATURE; UNIVERSAL CORRELATION; SODIUM-CHLORIDE; DISSOCIATION PRESSURES; STABILITY CONDITIONS; NATURAL-GAS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107358
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Predicting formation conditions of gas hydrates in salt water is important for the management of hydrate in processes such as flow assurance, deep-water drilling, and hydrate-based technology development. This paper applied and compared five machine learning algorithms to develop prediction tools for the estimation of methane hydrate formation temperature in the presence of salt water. These machine learning algorithms are Multiple Linear Regression, k-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Regression. In total, 702 experimental data points in literature from 1951 to 2020 were collected for modeling purposes. The experimental data span salt concentrations up to 29.2 wt% and pressures up to 200 MPa. Among these five machine learning methods, Gradient Boosting Regression gives the best prediction with R 2 = 0 . 998 and AARD = 0.074%. Thus, the methods of Gradient Boosting Regression function as an accurate tool for predicting the formation conditions of methane hydrates in salt water. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Methane Hydrate Dissociation Conditions in High-Concentration NaCl/KCl/CaCl2 Aqueous Solution: Experiment and Correlation [J].
Aregbe, Azeez G. ;
Sun, Baojiang ;
Chen, Litao .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, 2019, 64 (07) :2929-2939
[2]   Experimental gas hydrate dissociation pressures for pure methane in aqueous solutions of MgCl2 and CaCl2 and for a (methane plus ethane) gas mixture in an aqueous solution of (NaCl+MgCl2) [J].
Atik, Zadjia ;
Windmeier, Christoph ;
Oellrich, Lothar R. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, 2006, 51 (05) :1862-1867
[3]   Phase equilibrium modelling of natural gas hydrate formation conditions using LSSVM approach [J].
Baghban, Alireza ;
Namvarrechi, Saman ;
Le Thi Kim Phung ;
Lee, Moonyong ;
Bahadori, Alireza ;
Kashiwao, Tomoaki .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (16) :1431-1438
[4]  
Beygelzimer A., 2015, PACKAGE FNN
[5]  
Botrel T, 2001, OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]   Methane hydrate phase equilibria for systems containing NaCl, KCl, and NH4Cl [J].
Cha, Minjun ;
Hu, Yue ;
Sum, Amadeu K. .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2016, 413 :2-9
[8]   A new approach to gas hydrate modelling [J].
Chen, GJ ;
Guo, TM .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1998, 71 (02) :145-151
[9]   Effect of KCl and MgCl2 on the kinetics of methane hydrate formation and dissociation in sandy sediments [J].
Chong, Zheng Rong ;
Koh, Jun Wee ;
Linga, Praveen .
ENERGY, 2017, 137 :518-529
[10]   Rheological study of CO2 hydrate slurry in a dynamic loop applied to secondary refrigeration [J].
Delahaye, Anthony ;
Fournaison, Laurence ;
Marinhas, Sandrine ;
Martinez, Maria Carmen .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2008, 63 (13) :3551-3559