XFOIL vs CFD performance predictions for high lift low Reynolds number airfoils

被引:141
作者
Morgado, J. [1 ]
Vizinho, R. [2 ]
Silvestre, M. A. R. [1 ]
Pascoa, J. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Beira Interior, Aerosp Sci Dept, Edificio 2 Engn,Calcada Fonte do Lameiro 1, P-6201001 Covilha, Portugal
[2] Univ Beira Interior, Electromech Dept, Edificio 1 Engn,Calcada Fonte do Lameiro 1, P-6201001 Covilha, Portugal
关键词
XFOIL; Airfoil analysis; k - kl - omega modified transition model; k - omega SST turbulence model; FREE-STREAM TURBULENCE; EDDY-VISCOSITY MODEL; BOUNDARY-LAYERS; DESIGN; TRANSITION; PROPELLER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2016.02.031
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory is an extensively used technique for calculation of propeller aerodynamic performance. With this method, the airfoil data needs to be as accurate as possible. At the same time, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is becoming increasingly popular in the design and optimization of devices that depend on aerodynamics. For fixed and rotary wing applications, the airfoil lift over drag coefficient is the dominant airfoil performance parameter. Selecting a suitable computational tool is crucial for the successful design and optimization of this ratio. The XFOIL code, the Shear Stress Transport k - omega turbulence model and a refurbished version of k - kl - omega transition model were used to predict the airfoil aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds numbers (around 2.0 x 10(5)). It has been shown that the XFOIL code gives the overall best prediction results. Also, it is not clear that CFD turbulence models, even with boundary layer transition detection capability, can compute better airfoil performance predictions data. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Bardina J., 1997, 28 FLUID DYN C AM I
[2]  
BRADSHAW P, 1994, EXP FLUIDS, V16, P203
[3]   A modified low-Reynolds-number turbulence model applicable to recirculating flow in pipe expansion [J].
Chang, KC ;
Hsieh, WD ;
Chen, CS .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1995, 117 (03) :417-423
[4]   Prediction of turbulent transitional phenomena with a nonlinear eddy-viscosity model [J].
Craft, TJ ;
Launder, BE ;
Suga, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 1997, 18 (01) :15-28
[5]   Development and application of a cubic eddy-viscosity model of turbulence [J].
Craft, TJ ;
Launder, BE ;
Suga, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 1996, 17 (02) :108-115
[6]  
Drela, 1989, LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4#editorsandaffiliations, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1]
[7]  
Dryden H., 1937, 562 NACA
[8]  
Dumas A., 2011, 2011012786 SAE
[9]  
Gamboa P.V., 2013, 6 INT C AD MOD SIM A, P1
[10]  
Ilieva Galina, 2012, CENTRAL EUROPEAN J E, V2, P189, DOI DOI 10.2478/S13531-011-0070-1