Adherence to combination DMARD therapy and treatment outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal study of new and existing DMARD users

被引:26
作者
Wabe, Nasir [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Anita [3 ]
Wechalekar, Mihir [4 ]
McWilliams, Leah [3 ]
Proudman, Susanna [3 ]
Wiese, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Sch Pharm & Med Sci, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Univ South Australia, Sansom Inst Hlth Res, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Rheumatol Unit, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[4] Repatriat Gen Hosp, Rheumatol Unit, Daw Pk, Adelaide, SA 5041, Australia
关键词
Medication adherence; Treatment outcomes; Rheumatoid arthritis; Propensity scores; Clinical outcomes; MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS; TO-TARGET STRATEGY; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; RESPONSE CRITERIA; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; EUROPEAN-LEAGUE; 1ST YEAR; VALIDATION; BIOLOGICS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s00296-017-3655-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Medication adherence is believed to be a major contributor to treatment outcomes yet studies quantifying this relationship as rare in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To determine the association of adherence to DMARD therapy with treatment outcomes among new and existing DMARD users over 2 years. Relevant clinical parameters were obtained from a longitudinal cohort of RA patients, most of who were treated with combination therapy. Patients were classified as adherent if the proportion of days covered for each DMARD was ae<yen>80%. Outcome measures were the change in the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), modified health assessment questionnaires (mHAQ) and proportion of patients who achieved response criteria. An inverse propensity-score weighting method was used to estimate the association of adherence with each outcome. Of 194 patients invited, a total of 111 patients (new = 45 and existing = 66 DMARD users) met study eligibility. DMARD-naive patients demonstrated relatively higher rates of adherence compared to existing users. After controlling for confounding variables, adherence was significantly associated with reduction in DAS28 (beta = -1.5, 95% CI of beta = - 2.17 to -0.83, p < 0.0001), SDAI (beta = -9.44, 95% CI of beta = -15.53 to -3.35, p = 0.002) and mHAQ (beta = -0.269, 95% CI of beta, -0.462 to -0.077, p = 0.017) over 2 years among new patients and adherent patients were more likely to achieve most response criteria compared to non-adherent patients. Such associations were not replicated among existing DMARD users. Adherence to combination DMARD therapy was associated with improvements in disease activity and functional outcomes in the first 2 years of therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 904
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Real-world effectiveness of select biologic and DMARD monotherapy and combination therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the RADIUS observational registry
    Weaver, AL
    Lautzenheiser, RL
    Schiff, MH
    Gibofsky, A
    Perruquet, JL
    Luetkemeyer, J
    Paulus, HE
    Xia, HA
    Leff, JA
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (01) : 185 - 198
  • [32] regThe patient perspective on biologic DMARD dose reduction in rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed methods study
    Verhoef, Lise M.
    Selten, Ellen M. H.
    Vriezekolk, Johanna E.
    de Jong, Alphons J. L.
    van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
    den Broeder, Alfons A.
    Hulscher, Marlies E.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 57 (11) : 1947 - 1955
  • [33] ADVERSE EVENTS RELATED TO TARGET SYNTHETIC AND BIOLOGIC DMARD THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Rojas-Zuleta, Wilmer
    Becerra-Arias, Carolina
    Portilla, Yesid
    Donado, Jorge
    Duque-Zapata, Natalia
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 29 : S87 - S87
  • [34] Analysis of the reasons for DMARD therapy discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Czech and Slovak republics
    Pavelka, K
    Forejtová, S
    Pavelková, A
    Zvárová, J
    Rovensky, J
    Tuchynová, A
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 21 (03) : 220 - 226
  • [35] The efficacy and safety of bucillamine as a second-line DMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study
    Suda, Akiko
    Nagaoka, Shouhei
    Ohono, Shigeru
    Ideguchi, Haruko
    Soga, Takayoshi
    Ishigatsubo, Yoshiaki
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 18 (06) : 609 - 614
  • [36] Baseline factors predicting change from the initial DMARD treatment during the first 2 years of rheumatoid arthritis: experience in the ERAN inception cohort
    McWilliams, Daniel F.
    Kiely, Patrick D. W.
    Young, Adam
    Walsh, David A.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [37] Descriptive study of the use of DMARD in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis or persistent arthritis who start drug treatment in Spain (FIRST)
    Francisco Javier, Blanco
    Javier, Ballina
    Jordi, Carbonell
    Emilio, Martin-Mola
    Jesus, Tornero
    Esteban, Ramirez
    Jordi, Galvan
    REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA, 2011, 7 (02): : 88 - 93
  • [38] Which patients with rheumatoid arthritis do not receive DMARD treatment? Analysis of data from the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers
    Thiele, K.
    Callhoff, J.
    Eidner, T.
    Hoese, G.
    Karberg, K.
    Wassenberg, S.
    Zink, A.
    Albrecht, K.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 79 (02): : 153 - 159
  • [39] DMARD INITIATION IN OLDER ADULTS WITH NEW DIAGNOSIS OF LATE-ONSET RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Lee, J.
    Singh, N.
    Yung, R.
    Makris, U.
    Bynum, J.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 : 1340 - 1341
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of the new DMARD leflunomide: Comparison to placebo and sulfasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis
    Smolen, JS
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1999, 28 : 15 - 21