The analgesic efficacy of lidocaine/prilocaine (EMLA) cream during fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules

被引:37
作者
Gursoy, Alptekin [1 ]
Ertugrul, Derun Taner [1 ]
Sahin, Mustafa [1 ]
Tutuncu, Neslihan Bascil [1 ]
Demirer, Asli Nar [1 ]
Demirag, Nilgun Guvener [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Fac Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02802.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Pain is one of the few drawbacks of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in patients with nodular thyroid disease (NTD). Lidocaine/prilocaine cream, an eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA), is a frequently used topical anaesthetic. Despite its well-documented efficacy for the relief of pain associated with other cutaneous procedures that involve needle insertion, the analgesic role of EMLA has not been previously reported in patients with NTD who are undergoing FNAB. The aim of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy of EMLA for FNAB-associated pain in patients with NTD. Design Double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients The study was conducted at a thyroid outpatient clinic. We studied 99 patients with NTD. Measurements Patients with NTD were allocated to receive either 2.5 g of EMLA (n = 50) or placebo (n = 49) 60 min before ultrasonographically guided FNAB. A series of four biopsies of each nodule was performed. Patients rated pain associated with the procedure according to a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), and 4-category verbal rating scale (VRS). Results When the EMLA group was compared with the placebo group, there were no significant differences with respect to age, sex, thyroid volume, nodule size or nodule site. Significant differences were noted in the pain ratings of the two groups according to all three pain scales. When the effectiveness of EMLA was compared with that of placebo, the mean VAS score was 25.0 +/- 22.3 mm vs. 40.0 +/- 30.5 mm (P = 0.006) and the mean NRS score was 2.9 +/- 2.3 points vs. 4.0 +/- 2.6 points (P = 0.02). The absolute numbers according to VRS score in each group was also significantly different (P = 0.01). Although our sample size was small, the data suggest that FNAB-associated pain was sex-related and that women were significantly more sensitive than were men (P = 0.003 for VAS score and P = 0.001 for NRS score). No adverse effects from the use of EMLA were reported. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that a topical anaesthetic, EMLA, provides an effective and noninvasive analgesia during the FNAB of NTD.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 694
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, ENDOCR PRACT
  • [2] A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data
    Breivik, EK
    Björnsson, GA
    Skovlund, E
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [3] Cannon CR, 1999, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V120, P458
  • [4] Women experience more pain and require more morphine than men to achieve a similar degree of analgesia
    Cepeda, MS
    Carr, DB
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (05) : 1464 - 1468
  • [5] De Freitas R, 1998, INT SURG, V83, P72
  • [6] Topical anesthetics for dermal instrumentation: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
    Eidelman, A
    Weiss, JM
    Lau, J
    Carr, DB
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (04) : 343 - 351
  • [7] SEX-DIFFERENCES IN THE PERCEPTION OF NOXIOUS HEAT STIMULI
    FEINE, JS
    BUSHNELL, MC
    MIRON, D
    DUNCAN, GH
    [J]. PAIN, 1991, 44 (03) : 255 - 262
  • [8] Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: A reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain
    Jensen, MP
    Chen, C
    Brugger, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2003, 4 (07) : 407 - 414
  • [9] Gender, coping and the perception of pain
    Keogh, E
    Herdenfeldt, M
    [J]. PAIN, 2002, 97 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [10] Perianal and intrarectal anaesthesia for transrectal biopsy of the prostate: a prospective randomized study comparing lidocaine-prilocaine cream and placebo
    Raber, M
    Scattoni, V
    Roscigno, M
    Rigatti, P
    Montorsi, F
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (09) : 1264 - 1267