Reliability of motor-evoked potentials during resting and active contraction conditions

被引:81
作者
Kamen, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Exercise Sci, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; variability; evoked potentials; electromyography;
D O I
10.1249/01.MSS.0000139804.02576.6A
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the reliability of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) obtained using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and biceps brachii muscles. Methods: Fourteen college subjects attended the laboratory on three separate days. TMS was used to obtain MEP with the subject relaxed (resting condition) at stimulation intensities of 70%, 85%, and 100% of maximal stimulator output. MEP were also obtained during four active contraction conditions involving contractions of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximal effort (MVC). Reliability was measured using an intraclass correlation analysis of variance (ANOVA) design. Results: In the resting condition, substantial increases in MEP amplitude were observed for both muscles from day 1 to day 2. Intraclass reliability estimates were higher for the biceps muscle (ICC = 0.95-0.99) than for the FDI muscle (ICC = 0.60-0.81). During the active conditions, the greatest MEP were observed at 25% and 50% MVC, with smaller MEP at 75% and 100% MVC. Intraclass correlations in the active condition were approximately 0.63-0.73. Conclusions: Moderate to good reliability of MEP amplitude in the biceps and FDI muscles can be obtained using TMS in both resting and active contraction conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1574 / 1579
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Latency of changes in spinal motoneuron excitability evoked by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in spinal cord injured individuals [J].
Alexeeva, N ;
Broton, JG ;
Calancie, B .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 109 (04) :297-303
[2]   FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
AMASSIAN, VE ;
CRACCO, RQ ;
MACCABEE, PJ .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06) :401-416
[3]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Neurophysiological applications and safety [J].
Anand, S ;
Hotson, J .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2002, 50 (03) :366-386
[4]   TASK-RELATED VARIATION IN CORTICOSPINAL OUTPUT EVOKED BY TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN THE MACAQUE MONKEY [J].
BAKER, SN ;
OLIVIER, E ;
LEMON, RN .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1995, 488 (03) :795-801
[5]   Inhibitory action of forearm flexor muscle afferents on corticospinal outputs to antagonist muscles in humans [J].
Bertolasi, L ;
Priori, A ;
Tinazzi, M ;
Bertasi, V ;
Rothwell, JC .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1998, 511 (03) :947-956
[6]   Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation [J].
Carroll, TJ ;
Riek, S ;
Carson, RG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2001, 112 (02) :193-202
[7]   Safety of different inter-train intervals for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and recommendations for safe ranges of stimulation parameters [J].
Chen, R ;
Gerloff, C ;
Classen, J ;
Wassermann, EM ;
Hallett, M ;
Cohen, LG .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 105 (06) :415-421
[8]  
Cram Jeffrey R., 1998, P1
[9]   The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans [J].
Di Lazzaro, V ;
Oliviero, A ;
Pilato, F ;
Saturno, E ;
Dileone, M ;
Mazzone, P ;
Insola, A ;
Tonali, PA ;
Rothwell, JC .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (02) :255-266
[10]   Variability in the amplitude of skeletal muscle responses to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man [J].
Ellaway, PH ;
Davey, NJ ;
Maskill, DW ;
Rawlinson, SR ;
Lewis, HS ;
Anissimova, NP .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 109 (02) :104-113