Endorectal MR imaging of prostate cancer: Evaluation of tumor capsular contact length as a sign of extracapsular extension

被引:7
作者
Mendez, Gustavo [1 ]
Foste, Bryan R. [1 ]
Li, Xin [2 ]
Shannon, Jackilen [3 ]
Garzotto, Mark [4 ,5 ]
Arnling, Christopher L. [4 ]
Coakley, Fergus V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L340, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Adv Imaging Res Ctr, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L340, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, OHSU PSU Sch Publ Hlth, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L340, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Urol, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L340, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland VA Med Ctr, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L340, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
MR imaging; Prostate cancer; Extracapsular extension; EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION; MARGIN STATUS; BIOPSY; COIL; CARCINOMA; ACCURACY; STAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.04.020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the length of contact between dominant tumor foci and the prostatic capsule as a sign of extracapsular extension at endorectal multiparametric MR imaging. Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified 101 patients over a three-year interval who underwent endorectal multiparametric prostate MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Two readers identified the presence of dominant tumor focus (largest lesion with PI-RADS version 2 score of 4 or 5), and measured the length of tumor capsular contact and likelihood of extracapsular extension by standard criteria (1-5 Likert scale). Results were analyzed using histopathological review as reference standard. Results: Extracapsular extension was found at histopathological review in 27 patients. Reader 1 (2) identified dominant tumor in 79 (73) patients, with mean tumor capsular contact length of 18.2 (14.0) mm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for identification of extracapsular extension by tumor capsular contact length was 0.76 for reader 1 and 0.77 for reader 2, with optimal discrimination at values of 18 mm and 21 mm, respectively. In the subset of patients without obvious extracapsular extension by standard criteria (Likert scores 1-3), corresponding values were 0.74 and 0.66 with optimal thresholds of 24 and 21 mm. Conclusion: Length of contact between the dominant tumor focus and the capsule is a moderately useful sign of extracapsular extension at endorectal multiparametric prostate MR imaging, including the subset of patients without obvious extracapsular extension by standard criteria, with optimal discrimination at threshold values of 18 to 24 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 285
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Predictive Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Determined Tumor Contact Length for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer
    Baco, Eduard
    Rud, Erik
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Svindland, Aud
    Eggesbo, Heidi B.
    Hung, Andrew J.
    Matsugasumi, Toru
    Bernhard, Jean-Christophe
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Ukimura, Osamu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (02) : 466 - 472
  • [2] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [3] Prostate cancer with a pseudocapsule at MR imaging: a marker of high grade and stage disease?
    Bonde, Apurva A.
    Korngold, Elena K.
    Foster, Bryan R.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Pettersson, David R.
    Troxell, Megan L.
    Simko, Jeffry P.
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (03) : 365 - 369
  • [4] Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer:: Factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results
    Cornud, F
    Flam, T
    Chauveinc, L
    Hamida, K
    Chrétien, Y
    Vieillefond, A
    Hélénon, O
    Moreau, JF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) : 203 - 210
  • [5] Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Hamoen, Esther H. J.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (02) : 233 - 245
  • [6] Interobserver variability between expert: Urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Henry, Pauline C.
    Van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Tkachuk, Douglas C.
    Watson, Kemp
    Lockwood, Gina A.
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    Cheung, Carol
    Belanger, Eric C.
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Boccon-Gibod, Liliane
    Bostwick, David G.
    Egevad, Lars
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Grignon, David J.
    Jones, Edward C.
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Moussa, Madeleine
    Sweet, Joan M.
    Trpkov, Kiril
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Srigley, John R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 32 (10) : 1503 - 1512
  • [7] Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils - Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Engelbrecht, Marc R.
    Jager, Gerrit J.
    Hartman, Robert P.
    King, Bernard F.
    Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) : 1055 - 1065
  • [8] Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: Correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology
    Graser, Anno
    Heuck, Andreas
    Sommer, Bernhard
    Massmann, Joerg
    Scheidler, Juergen
    Reiser, Maximillian
    Mueller-Lisse, Ullrich
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (01) : 84 - 90
  • [9] Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: Correlation with histopathology
    Jager, GJ
    Ruijter, ETG
    vandeKaa, CA
    delaRosette, JJMCH
    Oosterhof, GON
    Thornbury, JR
    Barentsz, JO
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (04) : 845 - 852
  • [10] Clinical Utility of Endorectal MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Preliminary Experience
    Jung, Adam J.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Kurhanewicz, John
    Wang, Zhen J.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Simko, Jeffry P.
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 40 (02) : 314 - 323