共 50 条
A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure
被引:10
|作者:
van Rees, Charles B.
[1
,2
]
Naslund, Laura
[1
,2
]
Hernandez-Abrams, Darixa D.
[3
]
McKay, S. Kyle
[1
,2
]
Woodson, C. Brock
[4
]
Rosemond, Amy
[1
,2
]
McFall, Brian
[3
]
Altman, Safra
[3
]
Wenger, Seth J.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, River Basin Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech Engn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词:
Nature -based solutions;
Green infrastructure;
Climate change;
Biodiversity;
Conservation;
Water resources management;
MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS;
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION;
RIVER RESTORATION;
CITIZEN SCIENCE;
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT;
DESIGN;
WATER;
IMPLEMENTATION;
OPPORTUNITIES;
COMMUNITIES;
D O I:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155078
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Natural infrastructure (NI) development, including ecosystem restoration, is an increasingly popular approach to lever-age ecosystem services for sustainable development, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation goals. Although implementation and planning for these tools is accelerating, there is a critical need for effective post-implementation monitoring to accumulate performance data and evidence for best practices. The complexity and longer time scales as-sociated with NI, compounded by differing disciplinary definitions and concepts of monitoring necessitate a deliberate and strategic approach to monitoring that encompasses different timeframes and objectives. This paper outlines a ty-pology of monitoring classes differentiated by temporal scale, purpose of data collection, the information benefits of monitoring, and the responsible party. Next, we provide a framework and practical guidelines for designing monitor -ing plans for NI around learning objectives. In particular, we emphasize conducting research and development moni-toring, which provides scientifically rigorous evidence for methodological improvement beyond the project scale. Wherever feasible, and where NI tools are relatively new and untested, such monitoring should avoid wasted effort and ensure progress and refinement of methodology and practice over time. Finally, we propose institutional changes that would promote greater adoption of research and development monitoring to increase the evidence base for NI im-plementation at larger scales.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文