A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure

被引:10
|
作者
van Rees, Charles B. [1 ,2 ]
Naslund, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez-Abrams, Darixa D. [3 ]
McKay, S. Kyle [1 ,2 ]
Woodson, C. Brock [4 ]
Rosemond, Amy [1 ,2 ]
McFall, Brian [3 ]
Altman, Safra [3 ]
Wenger, Seth J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, River Basin Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech Engn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Nature -based solutions; Green infrastructure; Climate change; Biodiversity; Conservation; Water resources management; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; RIVER RESTORATION; CITIZEN SCIENCE; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; WATER; IMPLEMENTATION; OPPORTUNITIES; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Natural infrastructure (NI) development, including ecosystem restoration, is an increasingly popular approach to lever-age ecosystem services for sustainable development, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation goals. Although implementation and planning for these tools is accelerating, there is a critical need for effective post-implementation monitoring to accumulate performance data and evidence for best practices. The complexity and longer time scales as-sociated with NI, compounded by differing disciplinary definitions and concepts of monitoring necessitate a deliberate and strategic approach to monitoring that encompasses different timeframes and objectives. This paper outlines a ty-pology of monitoring classes differentiated by temporal scale, purpose of data collection, the information benefits of monitoring, and the responsible party. Next, we provide a framework and practical guidelines for designing monitor -ing plans for NI around learning objectives. In particular, we emphasize conducting research and development moni-toring, which provides scientifically rigorous evidence for methodological improvement beyond the project scale. Wherever feasible, and where NI tools are relatively new and untested, such monitoring should avoid wasted effort and ensure progress and refinement of methodology and practice over time. Finally, we propose institutional changes that would promote greater adoption of research and development monitoring to increase the evidence base for NI im-plementation at larger scales.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing the efficacy of community-based natural resource management planning with a multi-watershed approach
    Mountjoy, Natalie J.
    Whiles, Matt R.
    Spyreas, Greg
    Lovvorn, James R.
    Seekamp, Erin
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2016, 201 : 120 - 128
  • [32] Citizen Science as an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence
    Aceves-Bueno, Erendira
    Adeleye, Adeyemi S.
    Bradley, Darcy
    Brandt, W. Tyler
    Callery, Patrick
    Feraud, Marina
    Garner, Kendra L.
    Gentry, Rebecca
    Huang, Yuxiong
    McCullough, Ian
    Pearlman, Isaac
    Sutherland, Sara A.
    Wilkinson, Whitney
    Yang, Yi
    Zink, Trevor
    Anderson, Sarah E.
    Tague, Christina
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2015, 18 (03) : 493 - 506
  • [33] Incorporating citizen science to advance the Natural Capital approach
    Seymour, Valentine
    Willls, Betheney
    Wilkin, Paul
    Burt, Peter
    Ikin, Ed
    Stevenson, Philip C.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 54
  • [34] An Integrated Sampling and Analysis Approach for Improved Biodiversity Monitoring
    DeWan, Amielle A.
    Zipkin, Elise F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 45 (05) : 1223 - 1230
  • [35] Participatory Mapping for Strengthening Environmental Governance on Socio-Ecological Impacts of Infrastructure in the Amazon: Lessons to Improve Tools and Strategies
    Mere-Roncal, Carla
    Cardoso Carrero, Gabriel
    Chavez, Andrea Birgit
    Almeyda Zambrano, Angelica Maria
    Loiselle, Bette
    Veluk Gutierrez, Felipe
    Luna-Celino, Vanessa
    Arteaga, Marliz
    Schmitz Bongiolo, Eduardo
    Segura Tomasi, Andre
    Van Damme, Paul Andre
    Lizarro Zapata, Dennis Edgar
    Broadbent, Eben North
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [36] Operational and strategic information processing: Complementing healthcare IT infrastructure
    Gardner, John W.
    Boyer, Kenneth K.
    Gray, John V.
    JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33-34 : 123 - 139
  • [37] MeteoMex: open infrastructure for networked environmental monitoring and agriculture 4.0
    Winkler, Robert
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021,
  • [38] Strategic Planning to Improve EHDI Programs
    White, Karl R.
    Blaiser, Kristina M.
    VOLTA REVIEW, 2011, 111 (02) : 83 - 108
  • [39] Monitoring Urban Green Infrastructure Changes and Impact on Habitat Connectivity Using High-Resolution Satellite Data
    Furberg, Dorothy
    Ban, Yifang
    Mortberg, Ulla
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [40] Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?
    Wainger, Lisa A.
    King, Dennis M.
    Mack, Richard N.
    Price, Elizabeth W.
    Maslin, Thomas
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (05) : 978 - 987