A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure

被引:10
|
作者
van Rees, Charles B. [1 ,2 ]
Naslund, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez-Abrams, Darixa D. [3 ]
McKay, S. Kyle [1 ,2 ]
Woodson, C. Brock [4 ]
Rosemond, Amy [1 ,2 ]
McFall, Brian [3 ]
Altman, Safra [3 ]
Wenger, Seth J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, River Basin Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech Engn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Nature -based solutions; Green infrastructure; Climate change; Biodiversity; Conservation; Water resources management; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; RIVER RESTORATION; CITIZEN SCIENCE; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; WATER; IMPLEMENTATION; OPPORTUNITIES; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Natural infrastructure (NI) development, including ecosystem restoration, is an increasingly popular approach to lever-age ecosystem services for sustainable development, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation goals. Although implementation and planning for these tools is accelerating, there is a critical need for effective post-implementation monitoring to accumulate performance data and evidence for best practices. The complexity and longer time scales as-sociated with NI, compounded by differing disciplinary definitions and concepts of monitoring necessitate a deliberate and strategic approach to monitoring that encompasses different timeframes and objectives. This paper outlines a ty-pology of monitoring classes differentiated by temporal scale, purpose of data collection, the information benefits of monitoring, and the responsible party. Next, we provide a framework and practical guidelines for designing monitor -ing plans for NI around learning objectives. In particular, we emphasize conducting research and development moni-toring, which provides scientifically rigorous evidence for methodological improvement beyond the project scale. Wherever feasible, and where NI tools are relatively new and untested, such monitoring should avoid wasted effort and ensure progress and refinement of methodology and practice over time. Finally, we propose institutional changes that would promote greater adoption of research and development monitoring to increase the evidence base for NI im-plementation at larger scales.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Approach for Prioritizing Natural Infrastructure Practices to Mitigate Flood and Nitrate Risks in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin
    Schilling, Keith E.
    Mount, Jerry
    Suttles, Kelly M.
    McLellan, Eileen L.
    Gassman, Phillip W.
    White, Michael J.
    Arnold, Jeffrey G.
    LAND, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [22] Framework of ecological infrastructure construction based on landsenses ecology: meeting natural and human needs
    Liu, Lingyu
    Shi, Longyu
    Chen, Dingkai
    Wu, Jie
    Yang, Fengmei
    Yang, Meng
    Zhao, Yang
    Ma, Xiaofei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2023, 30 (07) : 850 - 867
  • [23] Monitoring Green Infrastructure for Natural Water Retention Using Copernicus Global Land Products
    Taramelli, Andrea
    Lissoni, Michele
    Piedelobo, Laura
    Schiavon, Emma
    Valentini, Emiliana
    Xuan, Alessandra Nguyen
    Gonzalez-Aguilera, Diego
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (13)
  • [24] LTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure: learning landscape approach through evaluation
    Angelstam, Per
    Manton, Michael
    Elbakidze, Marine
    Sijtsma, Frans
    Adamescu, Mihai Cristian
    Avni, Noa
    Beja, Pedro
    Bezak, Peter
    Zyablikova, Iryna
    Cruz, Fatima
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Diaz-Delgado, Ricardo
    Ens, Bruno
    Fedoriak, Mariia
    Flaim, Giovanna
    Gingrich, Simone
    Lavi-Neeman, Miri
    Medinets, Sergey
    Melecis, Viesturs
    Munoz-Rojas, Jose
    Schackermann, Jessica
    Stocker-Kiss, Andrea
    Setala, Heikki
    Stryamets, Natalie
    Taka, Maija
    Tallec, Gaelle
    Tappeiner, Ulrike
    Tornblom, Johan
    Yamelynets, Taras
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (07) : 1461 - 1484
  • [25] Could green infrastructure supplement ecosystem service provision from semi-natural grasslands?
    Hooftman, Danny A. P.
    Kimberley, Adam
    Cousins, Sara A. O.
    Bueno, Silvia Santamaria
    Honnay, Olivier
    Krickl, Patricia
    Plue, Jan
    Poschlod, Peter
    Traveset, Anna
    Bullock, James M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 328
  • [26] Natural Assurance Scheme: A level playing field framework for Green-Grey infrastructure development
    Denjean, Benjamin
    Altamirano, Monica A.
    Graveline, Nina
    Giordano, Raffaele
    van der Keur, Peter
    Moncoulon, David
    Weinberg, Josh
    Costa, Maria Manez
    Kozinc, Zdravko
    Mulligan, Mark
    Pengal, Polona
    Matthews, John
    van Cauwenbergh, Nora
    Gunn, Elena Lopez
    Bresch, David N.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 159 : 24 - 38
  • [27] From ad-hoc modelling to strategic infrastructure: A manifesto for model management
    Arnold, Thorsten
    Guillaume, Joseph H. A.
    Lahtinen, Tuomas J.
    Vervoort, R. Willem
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2020, 123
  • [28] A new approach to forest biodiversity monitoring in Canada
    Boutin, Stan
    Haughland, Diane L.
    Schieck, Jim
    Herbers, Jim
    Bayne, Erin
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 258 : S168 - S175
  • [29] Learning from clinical medicine to improve the use of surrogates in ecology
    Barton, Philip S.
    Pierson, Jennifer C.
    Westgate, Martin J.
    Lane, Peter W.
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    OIKOS, 2015, 124 (04) : 391 - 398
  • [30] The development of a participatory assessment technique for infrastructure: Neighborhood-level monitoring towards sustainable infrastructure systems
    Hendricks, Marccus D.
    Meyer, Michelle A.
    Gharaibeh, Nasir G.
    Van Zandt, Shannon
    Masterson, Jaimie
    Cooper, John T., Jr.
    Horney, Jennifer A.
    Berke, Philip
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 38 : 265 - 274