A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure

被引:10
|
作者
van Rees, Charles B. [1 ,2 ]
Naslund, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez-Abrams, Darixa D. [3 ]
McKay, S. Kyle [1 ,2 ]
Woodson, C. Brock [4 ]
Rosemond, Amy [1 ,2 ]
McFall, Brian [3 ]
Altman, Safra [3 ]
Wenger, Seth J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, River Basin Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech Engn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Nature -based solutions; Green infrastructure; Climate change; Biodiversity; Conservation; Water resources management; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; RIVER RESTORATION; CITIZEN SCIENCE; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; WATER; IMPLEMENTATION; OPPORTUNITIES; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Natural infrastructure (NI) development, including ecosystem restoration, is an increasingly popular approach to lever-age ecosystem services for sustainable development, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation goals. Although implementation and planning for these tools is accelerating, there is a critical need for effective post-implementation monitoring to accumulate performance data and evidence for best practices. The complexity and longer time scales as-sociated with NI, compounded by differing disciplinary definitions and concepts of monitoring necessitate a deliberate and strategic approach to monitoring that encompasses different timeframes and objectives. This paper outlines a ty-pology of monitoring classes differentiated by temporal scale, purpose of data collection, the information benefits of monitoring, and the responsible party. Next, we provide a framework and practical guidelines for designing monitor -ing plans for NI around learning objectives. In particular, we emphasize conducting research and development moni-toring, which provides scientifically rigorous evidence for methodological improvement beyond the project scale. Wherever feasible, and where NI tools are relatively new and untested, such monitoring should avoid wasted effort and ensure progress and refinement of methodology and practice over time. Finally, we propose institutional changes that would promote greater adoption of research and development monitoring to increase the evidence base for NI im-plementation at larger scales.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Community Monitoring of Natural Resource Systems and the Environment
    Danielsen, Finn
    Eicken, Hajo
    Funder, Mikkel
    Johnson, Noor
    Lee, Olivia
    Theilade, Ida
    Argyriou, Dimitrios
    Burgess, Neil D.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2022, 47 : 637 - 670
  • [2] A multiple scale, function, and type approach to determine and improve Green Infrastructure of urban watersheds
    Arthur, Nils
    Hack, Jochen
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2022, 68
  • [3] How can learning-by-doing improve decisions in stormwater management? A Bayesian-based optimization model for planning urban green infrastructure investments
    Hung, Fengwei
    Hobbs, Benjamin F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2019, 113 : 59 - 72
  • [4] Citizen science and machine learning: Interdisciplinary approach to non-invasively monitoring a northern marine ecosystem
    Westphal, Ashleigh M. M.
    Breiter, C-Jae C.
    Falconer, Sarah
    Saffar, Najmeh
    Ashraf, Ahmed B. B.
    McCall, Alysa G. G.
    McIver, Kieran
    Petersen, Stephen D. D.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [5] Robotic Monitoring of Habitats: The Natural Intelligence Approach
    Angelini, Franco
    Angelini, Pierangela
    Angiolini, Claudia
    Bagella, Simonetta
    Bonomo, Fabio
    Caccianiga, Marco
    Santina, Cosimo Della
    Gigante, Daniela
    Hutter, Marco
    Nanayakkara, Thrishantha
    Remagnino, Paolo
    Torricelli, Diego
    Garabini, Manolo
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 72575 - 72591
  • [6] A mixed-methods approach to strategic planning for multi-benefit regional water infrastructure
    Harris-Lovett, Sasha
    Lienert, Judit
    Sredlak, David
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 233 : 218 - 237
  • [7] Opportunities for natural infrastructure to improve urban water security in Latin America
    Tellman, Beth
    McDonald, Robert I.
    Goldstein, Joshua H.
    Vogl, Adrian L.
    Floerke, Martina
    Shemie, Daniel
    Dudley, Russ
    Dryden, Rachel
    Petry, Paulo
    Karres, Nathan
    Vigerstol, Kari
    Lehner, Bernhard
    Veiga, Fernando
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [8] Trees and sidewalks: toward an infrastructure protection approach
    Otero-Duran, Laura
    Torres, Andres
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2024, 6
  • [9] Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection
    McKinley, Duncan C.
    Miller-Rushing, Abe J.
    Ballard, Heidi L.
    Bonney, Rick
    Brown, Hutch
    Cook-Patton, Susan C.
    Evans, Daniel M.
    French, Rebecca A.
    Parrish, Julia K.
    Phillips, Tina B.
    Ryan, Sean F.
    Shanley, Lea A.
    Shirk, Jennifer L.
    Stepenuck, Kristine F.
    Weltzin, Jake F.
    Wiggins, Andrea
    Boyle, Owen D.
    Briggs, Russell D.
    Chapin, Stuart F., III
    Hewitt, David A.
    Preuss, Peter W.
    Soukup, Michael A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 208 : 15 - 28
  • [10] Can we integrate ecological approaches to improve plant selection for green infrastructure?
    Farrell, C.
    Livesley, S. J.
    Arndt, S. K.
    Beaumont, L.
    Burley, H.
    Ellsworth, D.
    Esperon-Rodriguez, M.
    Fletcher, T. D.
    Gallagher, R.
    Ossola, A.
    Power, S. A.
    Marchin, R.
    Rayner, J. P.
    Rymer, P. D.
    Staas, L.
    Szota, C.
    Williams, N. S. G.
    Leishman, M.
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2022, 76