Estimating ambiguity fixed satellite orbit, integer clock and daily bias products for GPS L1/L2, L1/L5 and Galileo E1/E5a, E1/E5b signals

被引:15
|
作者
Duan, Bingbing [1 ]
Hugentobler, Urs [1 ]
Selmke, Inga [1 ]
Wang, Ningbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Astron & Phys Geodesy, Arcisstr 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany
关键词
Integer satellite clock; Ambiguity resolution; Daily code and phase biases; GPS and Galileo signals; Pilot and data;
D O I
10.1007/s00190-021-01500-0
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Ambiguity resolution of a single receiver is becoming more and more popular for precise GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) applications. To serve such an approach, dedicated satellite orbit, clock and bias products are needed. However, we need to be sure whether products based on specific frequencies and signals can be used when processing measurements of other frequencies and signals. For instance, for Galileo E5a frequency, some receivers track only the pilot signal (C5Q) while some track only the pilot-data signal (C5X). We cannot compute the differences between C5Q and C5X directly since these two signals are not tracked concurrently by any common receiver. As code measurements contribute equally as phase in the Melbourne-Wuebbena (MelWub) linear combination it is important to investigate whether C5Q and C5X can be mixed in a network to compute a common satellite MelWub bias product. By forming two network clusters tracking Q and X signals, respectively, we confirm that GPS C5Q and C5X signals cannot be mixed together. Because the bias differences between GPS C5Q and C5X can be more than half of one wide-lane cycle. Whereas, mixing of C5Q and C5X signals for Galileo satellites is possible. The RMS of satellite MelWub bias differences between Q and X cluster is about 0.01 wide-lane cycles for both E1/E5a and E1/E5b frequencies. Furthermore, we develop procedures to compute satellite integer clock and narrow-lane bias products using individual dual-frequency types. Same as the finding from previous studies, GPS satellite clock differences between L1/L2 and L1/L5 estimates exist and show a periodical behavior, with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.7 ns after removing the daily mean difference of each satellite. For Galileo satellites, the maximum clock difference between E1/E5a and E1/E5b estimates after removing the mean value is 0.04 ns and the mean RMS of differences is 0.015 ns. This is at the same level as the noise of the carrier phase measurement in the ionosphere-free linear combination. Finally, we introduce all the estimated GPS and Galileo satellite products into PPP-AR (precise point positioning, ambiguity resolution) and Sentinel-3A satellite orbit determination. Ambiguity fixed solutions show clear improvement over float solutions. The repeatability of five ground-station coordinates show an improvement of more than 30% in the east direction when using both GPS and Galileo products. The Sentinel-3A satellite tracks only GPS L1/L2 measurements. The standard deviation (STD) of satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals is reduced by about 10% when fixing ambiguity parameters to integer values.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Attitude Determination with GPS L1/Galileo E1 Observations from Common-Clock Receiver: A Comparison of Four Different Models
    Wu, Mingkui
    Li, Jiahang
    Luo, Shuai
    Liu, Wanke
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [32] GPS SBAS L1/L5 BISTATIC RADAR ALTIMETER
    Powell, S.
    Akos, D.
    Zavorotny, V.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2014, : 1544 - 1547
  • [33] Vulnerability Analysis of Civilian L1/E1 GNSS Signals against Different Types of Interference
    Jahromi, Ali Jafarnia
    Broumandan, Ali
    Daneshmand, Saeed
    Lachapelle, Gerard
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS+ 2015), 2015, : 3262 - 3271
  • [34] Galileo In-Orbit Validation E1 and E5 Signals: Experimental Results and Assessment
    Margaria, Davide
    Nicola, Mario
    Dovis, Fabio
    Linty, Nicola
    Musumeci, Luciano
    6TH ESA WORKSHOP ON SATELLITE NAVIGATION TECHNOLOGIES (NAVITEC 2012) AND EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON GNSS SIGNALS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012,
  • [35] Experimental results of multipath behavior for GPS L1-L2 and Galileo E1-E5b in static and kinematic scenarios
    Avram, Alexandra
    Schwieger, Volker
    El Gemayel, Noha
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEODESY, 2019, 13 (04) : 279 - 289
  • [36] Comparison of L1 and L5 Bands GNSS Signals Acquisition
    Leclere, Jerome
    Landry, Rene
    Botteron, Cyril
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (09)
  • [37] EXPRESSION OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE-6 E1, E2, L1 AND L2 OPEN READING FRAMES IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI
    THOMPSON, GH
    ROMAN, A
    GENE, 1987, 56 (2-3) : 289 - 295
  • [38] A Statistical Analysis of GPS L1, L2, and L5 Tracking Performance During Ionospheric Scintillation
    Delay, Susan H.
    Carrano, Charles S.
    Groves, Keith M.
    Doherty, Patricia H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ION 2015 PACIFIC PNT MEETING, 2015, : 1 - 9
  • [39] Development of DFMC SBAS Prototype System Using L1 and L5 Band Signals of GPS, Galileo, and QZSS
    Kitamura, Mitsunori
    Aso, Takahiro
    Sakai, Takeyasu
    Hoshinoo, Kazuaki
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION, 2018, : 353 - 364
  • [40] IGNSS Computation Models and Values for GPS and GALILEO L5/E5a Civil Aviation Receivers
    Garcia-Pena, Axel
    Macabiau, Christophe
    Julien, Olivier
    Mabilleau, Mikael
    Durel, Pierre
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS+ 2020), 2020, : 206 - 218