Transradial versus Transfemoral Access and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity-Score-Matched Studies

被引:1
作者
Del Rio-Pertuz, Gaspar [1 ]
Juarez, Michel [2 ]
Mekraksakit, Poemlarp [1 ]
Parmar, Kanak [1 ]
Ansari, Mohammad M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
[2] WuqKawoq Maya Hlth Alliance, Ctr Res Indigenous Hlth, Chimaltenango, Guatemala
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Cardiol, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
关键词
VASCULAR ACCESS; FEMORAL ACCESS; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1155/2022/6774439
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this study is to examine the association between vascular access sites and the incidence of AKI in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Background. Emerging evidence has suggested that transradial access (TRA) may be associated with lower rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) as compared with transfemoral access (TFA). However, most of these studies have included a nonselected study population undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on the association between TRA and AKI in this setting of STEMI are limited and with conflicting results. Methods. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for abstracts and full-text articles from inception to July 13(th) of 2021. Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score-matched (PSM) studies evaluating the association of TRA versus TFA access with AKI in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI. Data were integrated using the random effects model and generic inverse-variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results. A total of 10,093 studies were found. After applying our inclusion criteria, 5 studies from 2014 to 2021 with a total of 8,536 STEMI patients were included. TRA was not significantly associated with a reduced risk for AKI compared with TFA (odds ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.71-1.01, p 0.07, I-2 = 40%). Conclusions. Transradial access was not significantly associated with lower risk of AKI in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI compared with TFA. Larger studies are needed to clarify this outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Radial vs femoral access for the prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI) after coronary angiography or intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ando, Giuseppe
    Gragnano, Felice
    Calabro, Paolo
    Valgimigli, Marco
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 92 (07) : E518 - E526
  • [2] Impact of vascular access on acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Ando, Giuseppe
    Costa, Francesco
    Trio, Olimpia
    Oreto, Giuseppe
    Valgimigli, Marco
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (05) : 333 - 338
  • [3] ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Radial or Femoral Approach in a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bernat, Ivo
    Horak, David
    Stasek, Josef
    Mates, Martin
    Pesek, Jan
    Ostadal, Petr
    Hrabos, Vlado
    Dusek, Jaroslav
    Koza, Jiri
    Sembera, Zdenek
    Brtko, Miroslav
    Aschermann, Ondrej
    Smid, Michal
    Polansky, Pavel
    Al Mawiri, Abdul
    Vojacek, Jan
    Bis, Josef
    Costerousse, Olivier
    Bertrand, Olivier F.
    Rokyta, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (10) : 964 - 972
  • [4] Comparison of Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With the Transradial Approach Versus the Transfemoral Approach (from the PRIPITENA Urban Registry)
    Cortese, Bernardo
    Sciahbasi, Alessandro
    Sebik, Rodrigo
    Rigattieri, Stefano
    Alonzo, Alessandro
    Silva-Orrego, Pedro
    Belloni, Flavia
    Seregni, Romano G.
    Giovannelli, Francesca
    Tespili, Maurizio
    Ricci, Roberto
    Berni, Andrea
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 114 (06) : 820 - 825
  • [5] Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited
    DerSimonian, Rebecca
    Laird, Nan
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 45 : 139 - 145
  • [6] DI SANTO P, 2021, CIRC-CARDIOVASC INTE, V14
  • [7] The incidence and risk factors of cholesterol embolization syndrome, a complication of cardiac catheterization: A prospective study
    Fukumoto, Y
    Tsutsui, H
    Tsuchihashi, M
    Masumoto, A
    Takeshita, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (02) : 211 - 216
  • [8] Inhospital and 1-year mortality of patients who develop worsening renal function following acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Goldberg, A
    Hammerman, H
    Petcherski, S
    Zdorovyak, A
    Yalonetsky, S
    Kapeliovich, M
    Agmon, Y
    Markiewicz, W
    Aronson, D
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 150 (02) : 330 - 337
  • [9] Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
    Higgins, JPT
    Thompson, SG
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414): : 557 - 560
  • [10] The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Jueni, Peter
    Moher, David
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Savovic, Jelena
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Weeks, Laura
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343