Using Temporal Self-Regulation Theory to understand healthy and unhealthy eating intentions and behaviour

被引:44
作者
Evans, Rachel [1 ]
Norman, Paul [1 ]
Webb, Thomas L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield S1 2LT, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Fruit and vegetable intake; Habits; Past behaviour; Self-control; Temporal Self-Regulation theory; Snacking; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; FUTURE CONSEQUENCES; DIETARY BEHAVIOR; FOOD; FRUIT; METAANALYSIS; CONSUMPTION; IMMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The present research investigated whether Temporal Self-Regulation Theory (TST) can be used to help understand healthy and unhealthy eating intentions and behaviour. Design: A prospective design with two waves of data collection one week apart. Method: An online survey measured the key components of TST (i.e., connectedness, timing and valence beliefs, intentions, past behaviour, habit strength, perceived environmental cues, and self-control) with respect to eating fruit and vegetables (F & V; N = 133) or unhealthy snacks (N = 125). Eating behaviour was assessed one week later. Results: The components of TST explained significant amounts of the variance in intentions and behaviour for intake of F&Vs (22% and 64%, respectively) and unhealthy snacks (18% and 35%, respectively). Beliefs about positive and negative short-term outcomes significantly predicted intentions to perform both behaviours. Intentions and past behaviour significantly predicted consumption of F&Vs, and past behaviour moderated the relationship between intention and behaviour which became stronger as past behaviour increased. Past behaviour and habit strength significantly predicted unhealthy snacking. Conclusions: The findings suggest that TST may be a useful framework for understanding eating intentions and behaviour. However, research did not find support for all of the hypothesised relationships (e.g., self-regulatory capacity did not significantly predict eating behaviour and also failed to moderate the relationships between intentions and behaviour). Research using alternative measures of self regulatory capacity, along with experimental manipulations of TST variables, may be needed to further understand eating intentions and behaviour. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 364
页数:8
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
[2]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]   Missed by an inch or a mile? Predicting the size of intention-behaviour gap from measures of executive control [J].
Allan, Julia L. ;
Johnston, Marie ;
Campbell, Neil .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (06) :635-650
[5]   Individual differences in executive function predict distinct eating behaviours [J].
Allom, Vanessa ;
Mullan, Barbara .
APPETITE, 2014, 80 :123-130
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HLTH SURV ENGL 2014
[7]  
[Anonymous], APPL PSYCHOL INT REV
[8]  
[Anonymous], THE ECONOMICS OF CHO
[9]  
[Anonymous], CHANGE4LIFE EAT WELL
[10]  
[Anonymous], NAT DIET NUTR SURV R