Psychological adjustment and marital satisfaction following head injury. Which critical personal characteristics should both partners develop?

被引:25
作者
Blais, Marie Claude
Boisvert, Jean-Marie
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Psychol, Trois Rivieres, PQ G9A 5H7, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Sch Psychol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
traumatic brain injury; personal characteristics; psychological and marital adjustment;
D O I
10.1080/02699050701311075
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Primary objective and research design: Using a correlational design, this study verifies the relationships between personal characteristics of individuals with TBI and their spouses and their level of psychological and marital adjustment. Methods and procedure: Seventy individuals with TBI and their spouses in the post-acute rehabilitation phase completed self-report questionnaires assessing the predictive variables ( coping and social problem- solving strategies; perceived communication skills) and the criteria variables of psychological and marital adjustment. Main outcomes and results: In the target group, the characteristics most strongly related to adjustment variables were an effective attitude towards problems, infrequent use of avoidance coping strategies, and a positive perception of one's spouse's communication skills. Individuals with TBI and their spouses report significantly lower scores on some of these personal characteristics, compared to those of a matched control group of 70 couples from the general population. Conclusions: Specific personal characteristics are critical for psychological and marital adjustment following TBI. This knowledge may be of relevance for detecting couples at risk for developing difficulties in the post-acute rehabilitation phase. Rehabilitation interventions targeting the personal characteristics identified as critical for the adjustment process could help to prevent these difficulties.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 372
页数:16
相关论文
共 93 条
[11]   Validation of a general well-being schedule with a Francophonic population aged 50 to 75 [J].
Bravo, G ;
Gaulin, P ;
Dubois, MF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 1996, 15 (01) :112-128
[12]  
Brooks M.D., 1987, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V2, P1, DOI [10.1097/00001199-198709000-00003, DOI 10.1097/00001199-198709000-00003]
[13]   THE 5 YEAR OUTCOME OF SEVERE BLUNT HEAD-INJURY - A RELATIVES VIEW [J].
BROOKS, N ;
CAMPSIE, L ;
SYMINGTON, C ;
BEATTIE, A ;
MCKINLAY, W .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 49 (07) :764-770
[14]  
Carnes S.L., 2005, Families, Systems, Health, V23, P186, DOI DOI 10.1037/1091-7527.23.2.186
[15]   A stress process model of caregiving for individuals with traumatic brain injury [J].
Chronister, Julie ;
Chan, Fong .
REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 51 (03) :190-201
[16]  
Cohen S., 1995, Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists, P3
[17]   Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale [J].
Crane, DR ;
Middleton, KC ;
Bean, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2000, 28 (01) :53-60
[18]  
Crosson B., 1989, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V4, P46, DOI [DOI 10.1097/00001199-198909000-00008, 10.1097/00001199-198909000-00008]
[19]   Coping strategies and emotional outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison with orthopedic patients [J].
Curran, CA ;
Ponsford, JL ;
Crowe, S .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2000, 15 (06) :1256-1274
[20]  
D'Zurilla T.J., 1990, Psychological Assessment, V2, P156, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.2.2.156