Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance

被引：42

作者：

Robinson, Karen A. ^{[1
]}

Chou, Roger ^{[2
]}

Berkman, Nancy D. ^{[3
]}

Newberry, Sydne J. ^{[4
]}

Fu, Rongwei ^{[5
]}

Hartling, Lisa ^{[6
]}

Dryden, Donna ^{[6
]}

Butler, Mary ^{[7
]}

Foisy, Michelle ^{[6
]}

Anderson, Johanna ^{[5
]}

Motu'apuaka, Makalapua ^{[5
]}

Relevo, Rose ^{[5
]}

Guise, Jeanne-Marie ^{[5
]}

Chang, Stephanie ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, 1830 E Monument St,Suite 8068, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA

[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Pacific Northwest Evidence Based Practice Ctr, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA

[3] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, CB 7590 725,Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA

[4] RAND Corp, Southern Calif Evidence Based Practice Ctr, 1776 Main St,POB 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407 USA

[5] Portland VA Res Fdn, 3710 SW,US Vet Hosp Rd,Mail Code R&D71, Portland, OR 97239 USA

[6] Edmonton Clin Hlth Acad, Alberta Res Ctr Hlth Evidence, Room 4-496A,th Floor,11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada

[7] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, D351 Mayo MMC 197,420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA

[8] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Ctr Evidence & Practice Improvement, 540 Gaither Rd, Rockville, MD 20850 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2016年 / 70卷

基金：

美国医疗保健研究与质量局;

关键词：

Systematic reviews; Methods guidance;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.035

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objectives: As time and cost constraints in the conduct of systematic reviews increase, the need to consider the use of existing systematic reviews also increases. We developed guidance on the integration of systematic reviews into new reviews. Methods: A workgroup of methodologists from Evidence-based Practice Centers developed consensus-based recommendations. Discussions were informed by a literature scan and by interviews with organizations that conduct systematic reviews. Results: Twelve recommendations were developed addressing selecting reviews, assessing risk of bias, qualitative and quantitative synthesis, and summarizing and assessing body of evidence. Conclusions: We provide preliminary guidance for an efficient and unbiased approach to integrating existing systematic reviews with primary studies in a new review. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：38 / 44

页数：7

共 18 条

[1] A surveillance system to assess the need for updating systematic reviews. [J].

Ahmadzai N. ;

Newberry S.J. ;

Maglione M.A. ;

Tsertsvadze A. ;

Ansari M.T. ;

Hempel S. ;

Motala A. ;

Tsouros S. ;

Schneider Chafen J.J. ;

Shanman R. ;

Moher D. ;

Shekelle P.G. .

Systematic Reviews, 2 (1) :104

[2]

[Anonymous], METH ART AL

[3]

[Anonymous], 2009, Systematic reviews: CRD's guidancefor undertaking reviews in health care

[4]

[Anonymous], AHRQ PUBLICATION

[5]

[Anonymous], 22 COCHR C 2014

[6]

[Anonymous], 2012, PEER REV SEARCH STRA

[7]

Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490

[8]

Berkman ND, 2013, AHRQ PUBLICATION

[9] Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews [J].

Chung, Mei ;

Newberry, Sydne J. ;

Ansari, Mohammed T. ;

Yu, Winifred W. ;

Wu, Helen ;

Lee, Jounghee ;

Suttorp, Marika ;

Gaylor, James M. ;

Motala, Aneesa ;

Moher, David ;

Balk, Ethan M. ;

Shekelle, Paul G. .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (06) :660-668

[10] Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change [J].

Cornell, John E. ;

Mulrow, Cynthia D. ;

Localio, Russell ;

Stack, Catharine B. ;

Meibohm, Anne R. ;

Guallar, Eliseo ;

Goodman, Steven N. .

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (04) :267-270

← 1 2 →