Solving Mission-Wide Chance-Constrained Optimal Control Using Dynamic Programming

被引:2
作者
Wang, Kai [1 ]
Gros, Sebastien [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Engn Cybernet, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
来源
2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC) | 2022年
关键词
MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/CDC51059.2022.9993003
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper aims to provide a Dynamic Programming (DP) approach to solve the Mission-Wide Chance-Constrained Optimal Control Problems (MWCC-OCP). The mission-wide chance constraint guarantees that the probability that the entire state trajectory lies within a constraint/safe region is higher than a prescribed level, and is different from the stage-wise chance constraints imposed at individual time steps. The control objective is to find an optimal policy sequence that achieves both (i) satisfaction of a mission-wide chance constraint, and (ii) minimization of a cost function. By transforming the stage-wise chance-constrained problem into an unconstrained counterpart via Lagrangian method, standard DP can then be deployed. Yet, for MWCC-OCP, this methods fails to apply, because the mission-wide chance constraint cannot be easily formulated using stage-wise chance constraints due to the time-correlation between the latter (individual states are coupled through the system dynamics). To fill this gap, firstly, we detail the conditions required for a classical DP solution to exist for this type of problem; secondly, we propose a DP solution to the MWCC-OCP through state augmentation by introducing an additional functional state variable.
引用
收藏
页码:2947 / 2952
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Probabilistic reachability and safety for controlled discrete time stochastic hybrid systems [J].
Abate, Alessandro ;
Prandini, Maria ;
Lygeros, John ;
Sastry, Shankar .
AUTOMATICA, 2008, 44 (11) :2724-2734
[2]  
Altman E., 1999, Constrained Markov Decision Processes
[3]   CHANCE-CONSTRAINED DYNAMIC-PROGRAMMING AND OPTIMIZATION OF WATER-RESOURCE SYSTEMS [J].
ASKEW, AJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1974, 10 (06) :1099-1106
[4]  
Bertsekas D. P., 2017, Dynamic programming and optimal control, VI
[5]   The scenario approach to robust control design [J].
Calafiore, Giuseppe C. ;
Campi, Marco C. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2006, 51 (05) :742-753
[6]   CHANCE-CONSTRAINED PROGRAMMING [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1959, 6 (01) :73-79
[7]  
Kouvaritakis B., 2016, ADV TXB CONTROL SIGN, p1339.93005
[8]  
Lew T, 2019, EUR C AER SPAC SCI E, DOI [10.13009/EUCASS2019-388, DOI 10.13009/EUCASS2019-388]
[9]   Stochastic model predictive control with active uncertainty learning: A Survey on dual control [J].
Mesbah, Ali .
ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2018, 45 :107-117
[10]   Stochastic Model Predictive Control AN OVERVIEW AND PERSPECTIVES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH [J].
Mesbah, Ali .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2016, 36 (06) :30-44