Strategic Assessment of Lisbon's Accessibility and Mobility Problems from an Equity Perspective

被引:17
作者
Henrique Fontenele Garcia, Camila Soares [1 ]
Mauricio Ribeiro Macario, Maria do Rosario [1 ]
de Araujo Girao Menezes, Ezequiel Dantas [2 ]
Grangeiro Loureiro, Carlos Felipe [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, IST, CERIS, Ave Rovisco Pais, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Fed Ceara, DET, Campus Pici Bloco 703, BR-60440900 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
关键词
Accessibility; Mobility; Equity; Problems; Assessment; Strategic; SUSTAINABLE ACCESSIBILITY; SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORT; TRAVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11067-018-9391-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Accessibility planning with reference to sustainability and equity principles has been advocated as the best approach to deal with the urban mobility complexity. It has enabled the development of more sustainable and fair policies in relation to access provision. However, despite this paradigm shift, many planning initiatives in practice are still focused on assessing alternatives and proposing solutions, instead of centering on the understanding and assessment of problems as the primary activity of planning. Therefore, in order to contribute for the problem-oriented paradigm in the accessibility planning, this work proposes a strategic assessment methodology for unequal and inequitable distribution problems of accessibility and mobility. This methodology relies on spatial analysis techniques and allows the characterization of accessibility and mobility conditions, as well as the diagnosis of accessibility and mobility problems and their causal relationships. It was applied for the case of Lisbon and the results of the performed assessment allowed an intelligent reading of the problems considered. Specifically, it was found that Lisbon presents an unequal and inequitable distribution of job accessibility and mobility by private car and public transport, and also that job accessibility, along with other transportation, land-use and socioeconomic variables, impact the mobility levels of its citizens.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 439
页数:25
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Arora A., 2007, HDB SOCIOECONOMIC IM
[2]  
Banister D., 2002, TRANSPORT PLANNING
[3]   The sustainable mobility paradigm [J].
Banister, David .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2008, 15 (02) :73-80
[4]  
Baradaran S., 2001, Journal of Transportation Statistics, V4, P31
[5]  
Beder Sharon., 2000, New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law, V4, P227
[6]   Sustainable accessibility: a conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward [J].
Bertolini, L ;
le Clercq, F ;
Kapoen, L .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2005, 12 (03) :207-220
[7]   Toward Socially Sustainable Urban Transportation: Progress and Potentials [J].
Boschmann, E. Eric ;
Kwan, Mei-Po .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2008, 2 (03) :138-157
[8]   Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design [J].
Cervero, R ;
Kockelman, K .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 2 (03) :199-219
[9]  
Cervero Robert., 2005, ACCESSIBLE CITIES RE
[10]   Spatial difference analysis for accessibility to high level hospitals based on travel time in Shenzhen, China [J].
Cheng, Gang ;
Zeng, Xiankai ;
Duan, Lian ;
Lu, Xiaoping ;
Sun, Huichao ;
Jiang, Tao ;
Li, Yuli .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 53 :485-494