Residual herbicides affect critical time of Palmer amaranth removal in soybean

被引:7
|
作者
de Sanctis, Jose H. S. [1 ]
Barnes, Ethann R. [1 ,2 ]
Knezevic, Stevan Z. [1 ]
Kumar, Vipan [3 ]
Jhala, Amit J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, 279 Plant Sci Hall,POB 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] GreenLight Biosci, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Agr Res Ctr Hays, 1232 240th Ave, Hays, KS 67601 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
D O I
10.1002/agj2.20615
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) is one of the most difficult to control weeds in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production fields. Residual pre-emergence (PRE) herbicide applied at planting is one of the recommendations for management of herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth; however, information is not available about the effect of residual herbicides on critical time of Palmer amaranth removal (CTPAR) to prevent an unacceptable yield loss in soybean. The objective of this study was to determine the CTPAR in soybean affected by residual PRE herbicides compared with the no PRE herbicide in southcentral Nebraska. Field experiments were conducted in 2018 and 2019 in a grower's field infested with GR Palmer amaranth near Carleton, NE. The treatments were arranged in a split-plot design with PRE herbicides (no PRE herbicide, flumioxazin, and a premix of flumioxazin/metribuzin/pyroxasulfone) as the main plot and Palmer amaranth removal timings as subplot treatments (a weed-free control; a nontreated control; and Palmer amaranth removal timing at the V1, V3, V6, R2, and R5 soybean growth stages). In the absence of a PRE herbicide, the CTPAR at 5% soybean yield loss occurred at V1 and V6 soybean growth stages, equivalent to 194 and 480 Celsius growing degrees days (GDDc) in 2018 and 2019, respectively. When flumioxazin was applied alone, the CTPAR was delayed until the V3 and V6 soybean growth stages, or 341 and 501 GDDc. When flumioxazin/metribuzin/pyroxasulfone premix was applied, the CTPAR was delayed until the V2 and R1 soybean growth stages, corresponding to 255 and 546 GDDc, in 2018 and 2019, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1920 / 1933
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control
    Whitaker, Jared
    York, Alan
    Jordan, David
    Culpepper, A.
    Sosnoskie, Lynn
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2011, 15 (01): : 89 - 99
  • [2] Evaluation of residual palmer amaranth control with herbicides coated on fertilizer
    Linn, Summer L.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Barber, Tom
    Thrash, Benjamin
    Roberts, Trenton
    FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY, 2024, 6
  • [3] Cotton Response and Palmer Amaranth Control with Mixtures of Glufosinate and Residual Herbicides
    Cahoon, Charles W.
    York, Alan C.
    Jordan, David L.
    Seagroves, Richard W.
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2015, 19 (03): : 622 - 630
  • [4] Critical timing of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) removal in sweetpotato
    Smith, Stephen C.
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Monks, David W.
    Chaudhari, Sushila
    Schultheis, Jonathan R.
    Reberg-Horton, Chris
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) : 547 - 551
  • [5] Emergence pattern of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) influenced by tillage timings and residual herbicides
    Chahal, Parminder S.
    Barnes, Ethann R.
    Jhala, Amit J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 433 - 439
  • [6] Time of Application Influences Translocation of Auxinic Herbicides in Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
    Johnston, Christopher R.
    Eure, Peter M.
    Grey, Timothy L.
    Culpepper, A. Stanley
    Vencill, William K.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2018, 66 (01) : 4 - 14
  • [7] Palmer amaranth control, fecundity, and seed viability from soybean herbicides applied at first female inflorescence
    Scruggs, Eric B.
    VanGessel, Mark J.
    Holshouser, David L.
    Flessner, Michael L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 426 - 432
  • [8] Impact of auxin herbicides on Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) groundcover
    Priess, Grant L.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Farr, Rodger B.
    Mauromoustakos, Andy
    Butts, Thomas R.
    Roberts, Trenton L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (05) : 768 - 778
  • [9] Differential sensitivity of Kansas Palmer amaranth populations to multiple herbicides
    Kumar, Vipan
    Liu, Rui
    Stahlman, Phillip W.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2020, 112 (03) : 2152 - 2163
  • [10] RESISTANCE OF PALMER AMARANTH (AMARANTHUS-PALMERI) TO THE DINITROANILINE HERBICIDES
    GOSSETT, BJ
    MURDOCK, EC
    TOLER, JE
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 6 (03) : 587 - 591