Exergoeconomic analysis of a biomass post-firing combined-cycle power plant

被引:24
作者
Athari, Hassan [1 ]
Soltani, Saeed [2 ]
Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed [2 ]
Rosen, Marc A. [3 ]
Morosuk, Tatiana [4 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Univ Tabriz, Fac Mech Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Biomass; Gasifier; Combined-cycle power plant; Energy analysis; Exergy analysis; Exergoeconomic analysis; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSES; NATURAL-GAS; GASIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.033
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Biomass can be converted thermo- and bio-chemically to solid, liquid and gaseous biofuels. In this paper, energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analyses are applied to a biomass integrated post-firing combined-cycle power plant. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the cycle are found to be maximized at specific compressor pressure ratio values, and that higher pressure ratios reduce the total unit product cost Increasing the gas turbine inlet temperature and decreasing the compressor pressure ratio decreases the CO2 mole fraction exiting the power plant. The exergoeconomic factor for the biomass integrated post-firing combined-cycle power plant at the optimum energy/exergy efficiency is 0.39. This implies that the major cost rate of this power plant configuration is attributable to the exergy destruction cost rate. Increasing the compressor pressure ratio decreases the mass of air per mass of steam in the power plant, implying a reduction in the gas turbine plant size. Increasing both the compressor pressure ratio and the heat recovery steam generator inlet gas temperature increases the capital investment cost compared with the exergy destruction cost However, increasing the gas turbine inlet temperature decreases this ratio. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 561
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Exergoeconomic analysis of a hybrid system based on steam biomass gasification products for hydrogen production [J].
Abuadala, A. ;
Dincer, I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (20) :12780-12793
[2]  
Alauddin Z.A., 1996, THESIS U WALES UK
[3]   Worldwide use of biomass in power generation and combined beat and power schemes [J].
Arbon, IM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2002, 216 (A1) :41-57
[4]   Thermodynamic predictions of performance of a bagasse integrated gasification combined cycle under quasi-equilibrium conditions [J].
Arteaga-Perez, Luis E. ;
Casas-Ledon, Yannay ;
Prins, Wolter ;
Radovic, Ljubisa .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 258 :402-411
[5]   Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle System (ISCCS) using genetic algorithm [J].
Baghernejad, A. ;
Yaghoubi, M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (05) :2193-2203
[6]  
Bejan A., 1996, Energy Design and Optimization
[7]   Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power generation with supplementary biomass firing: Energy and exergy based performance analysis [J].
Bhattacharya, Abhishek ;
Manna, Dulal ;
Paul, Bireswar ;
Datta, Amitava .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) :2599-2610
[8]   Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation [J].
Datta, Amitava ;
Ganguly, Ranjan ;
Sarkar, Luna .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (01) :341-350
[9]  
Dincer I, 2013, EXERGY ENERGY ENV SU
[10]   Gasification of biomass wastes and residues for electricity production [J].
Faaij, A ;
vanRee, R ;
Waldheim, L ;
Olsson, E ;
Oudhuis, A ;
vanWijk, A ;
DaeyOuwens, C ;
Turkenburg, W .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1997, 12 (06) :387-407