An Easy Tool to Predict Survival in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases

被引:59
作者
Westhoff, Paulien G. [1 ]
de Graeff, Alexander [2 ]
Monninkhof, Evelyn M. [3 ]
Bollen, Laurens [4 ]
Dijkstra, Sander P. [4 ]
van der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M. [5 ]
van Vulpen, Marco [1 ]
Leer, Jan Willem H. [6 ]
Marijnen, Corrie A. [7 ]
van der Linden, Yvette M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] ARTI Inst Radiat Oncol Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Radiotherapy, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Leiden Univ, Dept Clin Oncol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2014年 / 90卷 / 04期
关键词
ILL CANCER-PATIENTS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; PALLIATIVE-CARE; FRACTION RADIOTHERAPY; SPINAL COLUMN; MODEL; ONCOLOGISTS; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.051
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Patients with bone metastases have a widely varying survival. A reliable estimation of survival is needed for appropriate treatment strategies. Our goal was to assess the value of simple prognostic factors, namely, patient and tumor characteristics, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and patient-reported scores of pain and quality of life, to predict survival in patients with painful bone metastases. Methods and Materials: In the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, 1157 patients were treated with radiation therapy for painful bone metastases. At randomization, physicians determined the KPS; patients rated general health on a visual analogue scale (VAS-gh), valuation of life on a verbal rating scale (VRS-vl) and pain intensity. To assess the predictive value of the variables, we used multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses and C-statistics for discriminative value. Of the final model, calibration was assessed. External validation was performed on a dataset of 934 patients who were treated with radiation therapy for vertebral metastases. Results: Patients had mainly breast (39%), prostate (23%), or lung cancer (25%). After a maximum of 142 weeks' follow-up, 74% of patients had died. The best predictive model included sex, primary tumor, visceral metastases, KPS, VAS-gh, and VRS-vl (C-statistic=0.72, 95% CI=0.70-0.74). A reduced model, with only KPS and primary tumor, showed comparable discriminative capacity (C-statistic=0.71, 95% CI=0.69-0.72). External validation showed a C-statistic of 0.72 (95% CI=0.70-0.73). Calibration of the derivation and the validation dataset showed underestimation of survival. Conclusion: In predicting survival in patients with painful bone metastases, KPS combined with primary tumor was comparable to a more complex model. Considering the amount of variables in complex models and the additional burden on patients, the simple model is preferred for daily use. In addition, a risk table for survival is provided. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 747
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Royston, Patrick ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :1432-1435
[2]   Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with symptomatic spinal bone metastases: a retrospective cohort study of 1 043 patients [J].
Bollen, Laurens ;
van der Linden, Yvette M. ;
Pondaag, Willem ;
Fiocco, Marta ;
Pattynama, Bas P. M. ;
Marijnen, Corrie A. M. ;
Nelissen, Rob G. H. H. ;
Peul, Wilco C. ;
Dijkstra, P. D. Sander .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (07) :991-998
[3]   Accuracy of survival prediction by palliative radiation oncologists [J].
Chow, E ;
Davis, L ;
Panzarella, T ;
Hayter, C ;
Szumacher, E ;
Loblaw, A ;
Wong, R ;
Danjoux, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :870-873
[4]   A predictive model for survival in metastatic cancer patients attending an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic [J].
Chow, E ;
Fung, KW ;
Panzarella, T ;
Bezjak, A ;
Danjoux, C ;
Tannock, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05) :1291-1302
[5]   How accurate are physicians' clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review [J].
Chow, E ;
Harth, T ;
Hruby, G ;
Finkelstein, J ;
Wu, J ;
Danjoux, C .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 13 (03) :209-218
[6]   Successful validation of a survival prediction model in patients with metastases in the spinal column [J].
Chow, Edward ;
Harris, Kristin ;
Fung, Kinwah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (05) :1522-1527
[7]   Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer [J].
Chow, Edward ;
Abdolell, Mohamed ;
Panzarella, Tony ;
Harris, Kristin ;
Bezjak, Andrea ;
Warde, Padraig ;
Tannock, Ian .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (36) :5863-5869
[8]   Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study [J].
Christakis, NA ;
Lamont, EB .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7233) :469-472
[9]   Quality of life in oncology practice: Prognostic value of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores in patients with advanced malignancy [J].
Coates, A ;
Porzsolt, F ;
Osoba, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (07) :1025-1030
[10]   Is baseline quality of life useful for predicting survival with hormone-refractory prostate cancer?: A pooled analysis of three studies of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group [J].
Collette, L ;
van Andel, G ;
Bottomley, A ;
Oosterhof, GON ;
Albrecht, W ;
de Reijke, TM ;
Fossà, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (19) :3877-3885