A carbon efficiency evaluation method for manufacturing process chain decision-making

被引:24
作者
Zhu, Shuo [1 ]
Jiang, Zhigang [1 ]
Zhang, Hua [1 ]
Tian, Guangdong [2 ]
Wang, Yanan [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Machinery & Automat, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Transportat Coll, Changchun 130022, Peoples R China
[3] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Low carbon manufacturing (LCM); Process chain decision-making; Manufacturing value; Carbon emission; Carbon efficiency evaluation; LIFE-CYCLE COST; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ANALYSIS MODEL; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; SELECTION; EMISSIONS; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.159
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low carbon manufacturing (LCM) is increasingly being regarded as the direction for technological innovation and implementation in industry. The manufacturing process chain plays a critical role in LCM to consider and define the whole production process, thus the analysis and evaluation method for its decision-making is urgently needed. Although interest in addressing carbon emission reduction in manufacturing is rising, the study of incorporating carbon emission reduction and economic improvement into the process chain is still considerably deficient. This work proposes a novel method to identify a process chain with the optimal carbon efficiency, where the carbon efficiency of process chain (CEpc) regarded as an effective indicator is evaluated by manufacturing value and carbon emissions defined based on eco-efficiency. In addition, the estimation models of manufacturing value and carbon emission are proposed, based on which, a decision-making model is established to solve the process chain decision-making issues with objective to maximize CEpc. An illustrative example of the sleeve part manufacturing process is conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of this method. And the outcome can help decision makers to select the process chain with optimal carbon efficiency based on the dynamic change of production and different processing conditions. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis on material utilization rate, recycling rate as well as processing efficiency is presented to reveal the impacts of relevant improvement measures in CEpc for manufacturers. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 680
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, World Economic Outlook
  • [2] Azevedo M., 2011, Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing, P575, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19692-8_100
  • [3] Challenges in materials and process selection
    Brechet, Y
    Bassetti, D
    Landru, D
    Salvo, L
    [J]. PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2001, 46 (3-4) : 407 - 428
  • [4] Simulation-based approach to modeling the carbon emissions dynamic characteristics of manufacturing system considering disturbances
    Cao, Huajun
    Li, Hongcheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 64 : 572 - 580
  • [5] A carbon efficiency approach for life-cycle carbon emission characteristics of machine tools
    Cao, Huajun
    Li, Hongcheng
    Cheng, Haiqin
    Luo, Yi
    Yin, Ruixue
    Chen, Yongpeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 37 : 19 - 28
  • [6] China Ministry of Finance, 2008, IMPL REG PROV REG EN
  • [7] A production planning in highly automated manufacturing system considering multiple process plans with different energy requirements
    Choi, Yong-Chan
    Xirouchakis, Paul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 70 (5-8) : 853 - 867
  • [8] Culaba A.B., 1999, J CLEAN PROD, V7, P435
  • [9] Development of a Concept to Optimize the Energy Efficiency in Forging Process Chains
    Denkena, Berend
    Park, Hong-Seok
    Behrens, Bernd-Arno
    Henjes, Jan
    Bertys, Sebastian
    Dahal, Prakash
    Lueken, Ingo
    Klassen, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRECISION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, 2013, 14 (07) : 1229 - 1236
  • [10] Life cycle cost for technology selection: A Case study in the manufacturing of injection moulds
    Folgado, R.
    Pecas, P.
    Henriques, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 128 (01) : 368 - 378