Modeling pulsed magnetization transfer

被引:81
作者
Portnoy, Sharon
Stanisz, Greg J.
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
quantitative MRI; magnetization transfer; pulsed MT; continuous wave MT; white matter; spinal cord;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.21244
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Modeling the effects of clinical magnetization transfer (MT) scans, which generate contrast using short, shaped radio-frequency (RF) pulses (pulsed MT), is complex and time-consuming. As a result, several studies have proposed approximate methods for a simplified analysis of the experimental data. However, potential differences in the MT parameters estimated by each method may complicate the comparison of reported results. In this study we evaluated three approximate methods currently used in quantitative MT (qMT) studies. In the first part of the investigation, an MT modeling technique that makes minimal approximations, other than the use of a two-pool tissue representation, was developed and validated. Subsequently, this technique served as a standard against which to evaluate the other, more approximate models. Each model was used to fit experimental data from samples of wild-type (WT) and shiverer mouse spinal cord, as well as simulated data generated by our minimal approximation modeling technique. The results of this study demonstrate that the approximations used in pulsed MT modeling are quite robust. In particular, it was shown that the semisolid pool fraction, MOB, which is known to correlate strongly with myelin content, and the transverse relaxation time of macromolecular protons, T-2(B), could be evaluated with reasonable accuracy regardless of the model used. Magn Reson Med 58:144-155, 2007. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 155
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ELEMENTARY DIFFERENT
[2]  
Barkovich AJ, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1099
[3]   Characterization of the NMR behavior of white matter in bovine brain [J].
Bjarnason, TA ;
Vavasour, IM ;
Chia, CLL ;
MacKay, AL .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 54 (05) :1072-1081
[4]   EFFECTS OF DIFFUSION ON FREE PRECESSION IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE EXPERIMENTS [J].
CARR, HY ;
PURCELL, EM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1954, 94 (03) :630-638
[5]   EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGIC ENCEPHALOMYELITIS AND MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - LESION CHARACTERIZATION WITH MAGNETIZATION TRANSFER IMAGING [J].
DOUSSET, V ;
GROSSMAN, RI ;
RAMER, KN ;
SCHNALL, MD ;
YOUNG, LH ;
GONZALEZSCARANO, F ;
LAVI, E ;
COHEN, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (02) :483-491
[6]   Magnetization transfer magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of neurological diseases [J].
Filippi, M ;
Rocca, MA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2004, 14 (04) :303-313
[7]   Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer using an inversion recovery sequence [J].
Gochberg, DF ;
Gore, JC .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (03) :501-505
[8]   APPLICATIONS OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC CROSS-RELAXATION SPECTROSCOPY TO TISSUES [J].
GRAD, J ;
MENDELSON, D ;
HYDER, F ;
BRYANT, RG .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 17 (02) :452-459
[9]   Understanding pulsed magnetization transfer [J].
Graham, SJ ;
Henkelman, RM .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (05) :903-912
[10]   MAGNETIZATION-TRANSFER AND T-2 RELAXATION COMPONENTS IN TISSUE [J].
HARRISON, R ;
BRONSKILL, MJ ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 33 (04) :490-496