Measuring asthma control - Clinic questionnaire or daily diary?

被引:174
作者
Juniper, EF
O'Byrne, PM
Ferrie, PJ
King, DR
Roberts, JN
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[4] London Sch Econ, LSE Hlth, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1164/ajrccm.162.4.9912138
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Daily symptom, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and medication diaries are often used in clinical trials of treatments for asthma on the assumption that they provide a better estimate of clinical status than does a questionnaire completed in the clinic. We conducted a study with the aim of comparing the measurement properties of the clinic-completed Asthma Control Questionnaire with those of the Asthma Control Diary. The diary is composed of questions and response options almost identical to those of the questionnaire, but uses PEFR instead of FEV1 as the measure of airway caliber. In an observational study, 50 adults with symptomatic asthma attended a McMaster University asthma clinic at 0, 1, 5, and 9 wk to complete the Asthma Control Questionnaire and other measures of asthma status. For 1 wk before each follow-up visit, patients completed the Asthma Control Diary every morning and evening. Concordance between the questionnaire and diary was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.87). Both reliability (ICC: questionnaire = 0.90; diary = 0.86) and responsiveness (responsiveness index: questionnaire = 1.06; diary = 0.90; p = 0.005) were better with the questionnaire than with the diary. Correlations between the two instruments and other measures of clinical asthma status were similar and close to a priori predictions. Both the Asthma Control Questionnaire and the Asthma Control Diary are valid instruments for measuring asthma control, but the questionnaire has slightly better discriminative and evaluative measurement properties than does the diary.
引用
收藏
页码:1330 / 1334
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS
    GUYATT, G
    WALTER, S
    NORMAN, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02): : 171 - 178
  • [2] MEASURING HEALTH-STATUS - WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES
    GUYATT, GH
    KIRSHNER, B
    JAESCHKE, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (12) : 1341 - 1345
  • [3] Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: comparison of measurement properties
    Juniper, EF
    Guyatt, GH
    Feeny, DH
    Griffith, LE
    Ferrie, PJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1997, 10 (10) : 2285 - 2294
  • [4] DETERMINING A MINIMAL IMPORTANT CHANGE IN A DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE
    JUNIPER, EF
    GUYATT, GH
    WILLAN, A
    GRIFFITH, LE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [5] Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control
    Juniper, EF
    O'Byrne, PM
    Guyatt, GH
    Ferrie, PJ
    King, DR
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1999, 14 (04) : 902 - 907
  • [6] MEASURING QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN ASTHMA
    JUNIPER, EF
    GUYATT, GH
    FERRIE, PJ
    GRIFFITH, LE
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1993, 147 (04): : 832 - 838
  • [7] THE MOS SHORT-FORM GENERAL HEALTH SURVEY - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY IN A PATIENT POPULATION
    STEWART, AL
    HAYS, RD
    WARE, JE
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1988, 26 (07) : 724 - 732