Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics

被引:5
作者
Vaniqui, Ana [1 ]
Canters, Richard [1 ]
Vaassen, Femke [1 ]
Hazelaar, Colien [1 ]
Lubken, Indra [1 ]
Kremer, Kirsten [1 ]
Wolfs, Cecile [1 ]
van Elmpt, Wouter [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, GROW Sch Oncol, Dept Radiat Oncol Maastro, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 16卷
关键词
Treatment planning QA; Prediction model; Overlap volume histogram (OVH); Knowledge based treatment planning; Dose-distance relation; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; CLINICAL VALIDATION; ARC THERAPY; OPTIMIZATION; IMRT; VMAT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA) by developing a database of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and a prediction model. These tools were used to assess automatically optimized treatment plans for rectal cancer patients, based on cohort analysis. Material and methods: A treatment plan QA framework was established and an overlap volume histogram based model was used to predict DVH parameters for cohorts of patients treated in 2018 and 2019 and grouped according to planning technique. A training cohort of 22 re-optimized treatment plans was used to make the prediction model. The prediction model was validated on 95 automatically generated treatment plans (automatically optimized cohort) and 93 manually optimized plans (manually optimized cohort). Results: For the manually optimized cohort, on average the prediction deviated less than 0.3 +/- 1.4 Gy and 4.3 +/- 5.5 Gy, for the mean doses to the bowel bag and bladder, respectively; for the automatically optimized cohort a smaller deviation was observed: 0.1 +/- 1.1 Gy and 0.2 +/- 2.5 Gy, respectively. The interquartile range of DVH parameters was on average smaller for the automatically optimized cohort, indicating less variation within each parameter compared to manual planning. Conclusion: An automated framework to monitor treatment quality with a DVH prediction model was successfully implemented clinically and revealed less variation in DVH parameters for automated in comparison to manually optimized plans. The framework also allowed for individual feedback and DVH estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Comprehensive Intra-Institution stepping validation of knowledge-based models for automatic plan optimization [J].
Castriconi, R. ;
Fiorino, C. ;
Broggi, S. ;
Cozzarini, C. ;
Di Muzio, N. ;
Calandrino, R. ;
Cattaneo, G. M. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 57 :231-237
[2]   Knowledge-based automatic optimization of adaptive early-regression-guided VMAT for rectal cancer [J].
Castriconi, Roberta ;
Fiorino, Claudio ;
Passoni, Paolo ;
Broggi, Sara ;
Di Muzio, Nadia G. ;
Cattaneo, Giovanni M. ;
Calandrino, Riccardo .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 70 :58-64
[3]   Automatic treatment planning based on three-dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique [J].
Fan, Jiawei ;
Wang, Jiazhou ;
Chen, Zhi ;
Hu, Chaosu ;
Zhang, Zhen ;
Hu, Weigang .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (01) :370-381
[4]   A broad scope knowledge based model for optimization of VMAT in esophageal cancer: validation and assessment of plan quality among different treatment centers [J].
Fogliata, Antonella ;
Nicolini, Giorgia ;
Clivio, Alessandro ;
Vanetti, Eugenio ;
Laksar, Sarbani ;
Tozzi, Angelo ;
Scorsetti, Marta ;
Cozzi, Luca .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
[5]   Assessment of a model based optimization engine for volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer [J].
Fogliata, Antonella ;
Wang, Po-Ming ;
Belosi, Francesca ;
Clivio, Alessandro ;
Nicolini, Giorgia ;
Vanetti, Eugenio ;
Cozzi, Luca .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 :236
[6]   A Knowledge-Based Approach to Improving and Homogenizing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Quality Among Treatment Centers: An Example Application to Prostate Cancer Planning [J].
Good, David ;
Lo, Joseph ;
Lee, W. Robert ;
Wu, Q. Jackie ;
Yin, Fang-Fang ;
Das, Shiva K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01) :176-181
[7]   What is plan quality in radiotherapy? The importance of evaluating dose metrics, complexity, and robustness of treatment plans [J].
Hernandez, Victor ;
Hansen, Christian Ronn ;
Widesott, Lamberto ;
Back, Anna ;
Canters, Richard ;
Fusella, Marco ;
Gotstedt, Julia ;
Jurado-Bruggeman, Diego ;
Mukumoto, Nobutaka ;
Kaplan, Laura Patricia ;
Koniarova, Irena ;
Piotrowski, Tomasz ;
Placidi, Lorenzo ;
Vaniqui, Ana ;
Jornet, Nuria .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 153 :26-33
[8]   Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations [J].
Hussein, Mohammad ;
Heijmen, Ben J. M. ;
Verellen, Dirk ;
Nisbet, Andrew .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1092)
[9]   Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy [J].
Hussein, Mohammad ;
South, Christopher P. ;
Barry, Miriam A. ;
Adams, Elizabeth J. ;
Jordan, Tom J. ;
Stewart, Alexandra J. ;
Nisbet, Andrew .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (03) :473-479
[10]   Independent knowledge-based treatment planning QA to audit Pinnacle autoplanning [J].
Janssen, Tomas M. ;
Kusters, Martijn ;
Wang, Yibing ;
Wortel, Geert ;
Monshouwer, Rene ;
Damen, Eugene ;
Petit, Steven F. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 :198-204