A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY BASED UPON THE INTERVAL TYPE-2 FUZZY SETS FOR EVALUATING RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATIVES IN TURKEY

被引:55
作者
Balin, Abit [1 ]
Baracli, Hayri [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34000 Besiktas, Turkey
关键词
renewable energy; Type-2 fuzzy sets; MCDM; TOPSIS; AHP; EFFICIENCY; TECHNOLOGIES; TOPSIS; UNCERTAINTY; CONSUMPTION; BUILDINGS; POLICIES; RANKING; ECONOMY; SECTOR;
D O I
10.3846/20294913.2015.1056276
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Energy is substantial for social development and has an essential role for the survival and development of human as an environmental factor. Due to the serious increase of the world's primary energy price and rapid development of Turkey's economy, energy consumption of Turkey has become a major problem. For that purpose, opinions of the decision makers upon the relative importance of selection criteria are determined by using a fuzzy AHP procedure based upon type-2 fuzzy sets, and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based upon the interval type-2 TOPSIS method is used to rank the best renewable alternative energy. In this paper, a fuzzy multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology was proposed to determine the best renewable energy alternatives for Turkey, because type-2 fuzzy sets provide additional degrees of independence to represent the uncertainty and the fuzziness of real world applications. The results showed that wind was the best alternative for Turkey's energy investments, as being followed subsequently by solar, biomass, geothermal, hydraulic and hydrogen. The results were based upon the opinions of three energy planning experts who ranked the energy alternatives according to the ten criteria we have selected.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 763
页数:22
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Energy efficiency and renewable technologies: the way to sustainable energy future
    Abulfotuh, Fuad
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2007, 209 (1-3) : 275 - 282
  • [2] Multivariate modeling and type-2 fuzzy sets
    Aisbett, Janet
    Rickard, John T.
    Morgenthaler, David
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2011, 163 (01) : 78 - 95
  • [3] An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects
    Aragones-Beltran, P.
    Chaparro-Gonzalez, F.
    Pastor-Ferrando, J. P.
    Rodriguez-Pozo, F.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (01) : 249 - 264
  • [4] Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection
    Balezentiene, Ligita
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Balezentis, Tomas
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 17 : 83 - 93
  • [5] An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul
    Celik, Erkan
    Bilisik, Ozge Nalan
    Erdogan, Melike
    Gumus, Alev Taskin
    Baracli, Hayri
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2013, 58 : 28 - 51
  • [6] Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP
    Chang, DY
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) : 649 - 655
  • [7] Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region
    Chang, Ni-Bin
    Parvathinathan, G.
    Breeden, Jeff B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 87 (01) : 139 - 153
  • [8] Chen S. M., 2011, P 2011 INT C MACH LE, P10
  • [9] Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    Yang, Ming-Wey
    Lee, Li-Wei
    Yang, Szu-Wei
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (05) : 5295 - 5308
  • [10] Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    Lee, Li-Wei
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (04) : 2790 - 2798