Unravelling the variability and causes of smallholder maize yield gaps in Ethiopia

被引:62
作者
Assefa, Banchayehu Tessema [1 ]
Chamberlin, Jordan [2 ]
Reidsma, Pytrik [1 ]
Silva, Joao Vasco [1 ,3 ]
van Ittersum, Martin K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Plant Prod Syst, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Nairobi, Kenya
[3] Wageningen Univ, Ctr Crop Syst Anal, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Zea mays L; Production ecology; Smallholder agriculture; Stochastic frontier analysis; Sustainable intensification; Yield response to N; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; ZEA-MAYS L; ECOLOGICAL INTENSIFICATION; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; MAJOR DETERMINANT; EASTERN ETHIOPIA; FOOD SECURITY; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s12571-019-00981-4
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Ethiopia has achieved the second highest maize yield in sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, farmers' maize yields are still much lower than on-farm and on-station trial yields, and only ca. 20% of the estimated water-limited potential yield. This article provides a comprehensive national level analysis of the drivers of maize yields in Ethiopia, by decomposing yield gaps into efficiency, resource and technology components, and accounting for a broad set of detailed input and crop management choices. Stochastic frontier analysis was combined with concepts of production ecology to estimate and explain technically efficient yields, the efficiency yield gap and the resource yield gap. The technology yield gap was estimated based on water-limited potential yields from the Global Yield Gap Atlas. The relative magnitudes of the efficiency, resource and technology yield gaps differed across farming systems; they ranged from 15% (1.6 t/ha) to 21% (1.9 t/ha), 12% (1.3 t/ha) to 25% (2.3 t/ha) and 54% (4.8 t/ha) to 73% (7.8 t/ha), respectively. Factors that reduce the efficiency yield gap include: income from non-farm sources, value of productive assets, education and plot distance from home. The resource yield gap can be explained by sub-optimal input use, from a yield perspective. The technology yield gap comprised the largest share of the total yield gap, partly due to limited use of fertilizer and improved seeds. We conclude that targeted but integrated policy design and implementation is required to narrow the overall maize yield gap and improve food security.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 103
页数:21
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Characteristics of maize cultivars in Africa: How modern are they and how many do smallholder farmers grow?
    Abate T.
    Fisher M.
    Abdoulaye T.
    Kassie G.T.
    Lunduka R.
    Marenya P.
    Asnake W.
    [J]. Agriculture & Food Security, 6 (1):
  • [2] Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia
    Abate, Tsedeke
    Shiferaw, Bekele
    Menkir, Abebe
    Wegary, Dagne
    Kebede, Yilma
    Tesfaye, Kindie
    Kassie, Menale
    Bogale, Gezahegn
    Tadesse, Berhanu
    Keno, Tolera
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2015, 7 (05) : 965 - 981
  • [3] The yield gap of major food crops in family agriculture in the tropics: Assessment and analysis through field surveys and modelling
    Affholder, Francois
    Poeydebat, Charlotte
    Corbeels, Marc
    Scopel, Eric
    Tittonell, Pablo
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2013, 143 : 106 - 118
  • [4] Aigner D., 1977, J ECONOMETRICS, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
  • [5] Amede T., 2015, The Evolving Farming and Pastoral Landscapes in Ethiopia: A Farming System Framework for Investment Planning and Priority Setting
  • [6] Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar
    Anderson, W. K.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2010, 116 (1-2) : 14 - 22
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2013, ETH EUR SOC SURV ERS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2015, ETH SOC SURV ESS 201
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition Guideline
  • [10] Can unobserved heterogeneity in farmer ability explain the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity
    Assunçao, JJ
    Ghatak, M
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (02) : 189 - 194