The seismic performance of K-braced cold-formed steel shear panels with improved connections

被引:30
作者
Pourabdollah, Omid [1 ]
Farahbod, Farhang [2 ]
Rofooei, Fayaz R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Earthquake Engn, Int Campus, Kish Island, Iran
[2] Rd Housing & Urban Dev Res Ctr BHRC, Dept Struct Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, POB 11155-4313, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Cold formed steel frame; Shear panel; K-braced; Ductility factor; Energy absorption; Secant stiffness; LIGHT-GAUGE; STUD WALLS; BEHAVIOR; SINGLE; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.04.008
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper the performance of light weight K-braced cold formed steel (CFS) shear panels under cyclic loading is experimentally evaluated. It is generally known that the brace-stud connection details has an important effect on the performance of the braced CFS shear panels in terms of lateral stiffness, energy dissipation, and ductility factor. In this study, four full-scale, 2.4 m x 2.4 m, braced CFS shear panels made of C-sections were tested. It was observed that proper modification of the currently utilized braced to stud connections in K-braced, CFS shear panels could enhance their performance considerably by increasing their ultimate shear resistance up to 7 folds. Furthermore, using gusset plate in the braced to stud connection of the K-braced CFS shear panels were shown to significantly increase their shear strength, energy dissipation and ductility capacities in comparison to the CFS shear panels with regular connections. That is due to the shifting of the failure modes which commonly occurs at the brace-stud connections, to buckling of the brace elements. As the obtained results indicate, the proposed connection modifications could appreciably improve the performance of these panels in comparison to those that are built based on current practice, without any appreciable increase in cost or installation effort.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   Comparing hysteretic behavior of light-gauge, steel plate shear walls and braced frames [J].
Berman, JW ;
Celik, OC ;
Bruneau, M .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (03) :475-485
[12]  
C. S. Association, 2002, N AM SPEC DES COLD F
[13]  
Dastjerdi M. Zeynalian, 2010, 4 INT C STRUCT ENG M, P607
[14]   Performance of wall-stud cold-formed shear panels under monotonic and cyclic loading Part I:: Experimental research [J].
Fülöp, LA ;
Dubina, D .
THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2004, 42 (02) :321-338
[15]   Shaketable tests of a cold-formed steel shear panel [J].
Kim, Tae-Wan ;
Wilcoski, James ;
Foutch, Douglas A. ;
Lee, Moon Sung .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2006, 28 (10) :1462-1470
[16]   Better connection details for strap-braced CFS stud walls in seismic regions [J].
Moghimi, Hassan ;
Ronagh, Hamid R. .
THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2009, 47 (02) :122-135
[17]   Experimental work on single and double-sided steel sheathed cold-formed steel shear walls for seismic actions [J].
Mohebbi, Saeed ;
Mirghaderi, Rasoul ;
Farahbod, Farhang ;
Sabbagh, Alireza Bagheri .
THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2015, 91 :50-62
[18]   Shear resistance of gypsum-sheathed light-gauge steel stud walls [J].
Serrette, R ;
Ogunfunmi, K .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1996, 122 (04) :383-389
[19]   Dynamic Testing of Single- and Double-Story Steel-Sheathed Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Shear Walls [J].
Shamim, Iman ;
DaBreo, Jamin ;
Rogers, Colin A. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2013, 139 (05) :807-817
[20]   Racking strength and stiffness of cold-formed steel wall frames [J].
Tian, YS ;
Wang, J ;
Lu, TJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2004, 60 (07) :1069-1093