Reboxetine combination in treatment-resistant depression to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

被引:19
作者
Lopez-Munoz, F.
Alamo, C.
Rubio, G.
Garcia-Garcia, P.
Pardo, A.
机构
[1] Univ Alcala de Henares, Dept Pharmacol, Fac Med, Madrid 28027, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Psychiat, Retiro Mental Hlth Serv, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Psychol, Dept Social Psychol & Methodol, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
关键词
MAJOR DEPRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANTIDEPRESSANT COMBINATIONS; COMBINING ANTIDEPRESSANTS; PARTIAL-RESPONSE; BUPROPION-SR; AUGMENTATION; FLUOXETINE; THERAPY; NONRESPONDERS;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-958523
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: Treatment-resistant depression is a relatively common clinical occurrence: between 60-70% of depressive patients fail to achieve total remission to the initial treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). Methods: In this prospective 12-week open-label study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the addition of reboxetine to 141 outpatients diagnosed with major depressive disorder, according to DSM-IV-TR criteria, who were partial responders or non-responders over a period of 6 weeks, to previous treatment in monotherapy with SSRI. Evaluation of antidepressant efficacy was carried out through the application of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I). Data were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, using the last-observation-carried-forward method. Results: Mean score on the HDRS at baseline was 26.24 +/- 7.21, failing to 13.96 +/- 8.00 in week 12 (mean decrease of 46.79%; p < 0.0001) The percentages of responders (HDRS total score >= 50%) and patients considered as benefiting from complete remission (HDRS score <= 10) at 12 weeks were 50.4% and 34.5%, respectively. By the end of the treatment, a mean decrease in CGI-I score of 1.88 points was obtained (41.14% of reduction; p < 0.0001), and 77% of the patients were evaluated as improved (CGI-I score < 4). Nervousness was the adverse effect most frequently reported (5.21%), followed by dryness of mouth (4.38%), and insomnia (3.56%). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the combination strategy with reboxetine appears to be a potentially useful tool in cases of SSRI-resistant depression.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 19
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Antidepressant combinations:: epidemiological considerations
    Agüera, LF
    Rojo, JE
    Ros, S
    de la Gándara, J
    de Pedro, JM
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 112 : 7 - 10
  • [2] Amsterdam J D, 1997, Depress Anxiety, V5, P84, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1997)5:2<84::AID-DA4>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-5
  • [4] No effect of the new antidepressant reboxetine on CYP2D6 activity in healthy volunteers
    Avenoso, A
    Facciolà, G
    Scordo, MG
    Spina, E
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1999, 21 (05) : 577 - 579
  • [5] Berman R M, 1997, Depress Anxiety, V5, P154, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1997)5:4<154::AID-DA2>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-D
  • [7] BLAZER DG, 1994, AM J PSYCHIAT, V151, P979
  • [8] Combining serotonin reuptake inhibitors and bupropion in partial responders to antidepressant monotherapy
    Bodkin, JA
    Lasser, RA
    Wines, JD
    Gardner, DM
    Baldessarini, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 58 (04) : 137 - 145
  • [9] Mirtazapine augmentation in the treatment of refractory depression
    Carpenter, LL
    Jocic, Z
    Hall, JM
    Rasmussen, SA
    Price, LH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 60 (01) : 45 - +
  • [10] A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of antidepressant augmentation with mirtazapine
    Carpenter, LL
    Yasmin, S
    Price, LH
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (02) : 183 - 188