Describing the catchment-averaged precipitation as a stochastic process improves parameter and input estimation

被引:37
作者
Del Giudice, Dario [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Albert, Carlo [1 ]
Rieckermann, Jorg [1 ]
Reichert, Peter [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Eawag, Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Carnegie Inst Sci, Dept Global Ecol, Stanford, CA USA
[4] ETH, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Biogeochem & Pollutant Dynam, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
CHAOHE BASIN; RAINFALL; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION; INFERENCE; CALIBRATION; RESOLUTION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1002/2015WR017871
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rainfall input uncertainty is one of the major concerns in hydrological modeling. Unfortunately, during inference, input errors are usually neglected, which can lead to biased parameters and implausible predictions. Rainfall multipliers can reduce this problem but still fail when the observed input (precipitation) has a different temporal pattern from the true one or if the true nonzero input is not detected. In this study, we propose an improved input error model which is able to overcome these challenges and to assess and reduce input uncertainty. We formulate the average precipitation over the watershed as a stochastic input process (SIP) and, together with a model of the hydrosystem, include it in the likelihood function. During statistical inference, we use "noisy'' input (rainfall) and output (runoff) data to learn about the "true'' rainfall, model parameters, and runoff. We test the methodology with the rainfall-discharge dynamics of a small urban catchment. To assess its advantages, we compare SIP with simpler methods of describing uncertainty within statistical inference: (i) standard least squares (LS), (ii) bias description (BD), and (iii) rainfall multipliers (RM). We also compare two scenarios: accurate versus inaccurate forcing data. Results show that when inferring the input with SIP and using inaccurate forcing data, the whole-catchment precipitation can still be realistically estimated and thus physical parameters can be "protected'' from the corrupting impact of input errors. While correcting the output rather than the input, BD inferred similarly unbiased parameters. This is not the case with LS and RM. During validation, SIP also delivers realistic uncertainty intervals for both rainfall and runoff. Thus, the technique presented is a significant step toward better quantifying input uncertainty in hydrological inference. As a next step, SIP will have to be combined with a technique addressing model structure uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:3162 / 3186
页数:25
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] Bayesian uncertainty assessment of flood predictions in ungauged urban basins for conceptual rainfall-runoff models
    Sikorska, A. E.
    Scheidegger, A.
    Banasik, K.
    Rieckermann, J.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (04) : 1221 - 1236
  • [42] STOCHASTIC PARAMETER-ESTIMATION PROCEDURES FOR HYDROLOGIC RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS - CORRELATED AND HETEROSCEDASTIC ERROR CASES
    SOROOSHIAN, S
    DRACUP, JA
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1980, 16 (02) : 430 - 442
  • [43] Separately accounting for uncertainties in rainfall and runoff: Calibration of event-based conceptual hydrological models in small urban catchments using Bayesian method
    Sun, Siao
    Bertrand-Krajewski, Jean-Luc
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (09) : 5381 - 5394
  • [44] A smoothing algorithm for estimating stochastic, continuous time model parameters and its application to a simple climate model
    Tomassini, Lorenzo
    Reichert, Peter
    Kuensch, Hans R.
    Buser, Christoph
    Knutti, Reto
    Borsuk, Mark E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2009, 58 : 679 - 704
  • [45] Vrugt JA., 2008, Water Resource Research, V44, P1
  • [46] A log-sinh transformation for data normalization and variance stabilization
    Wang, Q. J.
    Shrestha, D. L.
    Robertson, D. E.
    Pokhrel, P.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48
  • [47] Bayesian uncertainty analysis in distributed hydrologic modeling: A case study in the Thur River basin (Switzerland)
    Yang, Jing
    Reichert, Peter
    Abbaspour, Karim C.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (10)
  • [48] Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China
    Yang, Jing
    Reichert, Peter
    Abbaspour, K. C.
    Xia, Jun
    Yang, Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 358 (1-2) : 1 - 23
  • [49] Hydrological modelling of the chaohe basin in china: Statistical model formulation and Bayesian inference
    Yang, Jing
    Reichert, Peter
    Abbaspour, Karim C.
    Yang, Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 340 (3-4) : 167 - 182