Describing the catchment-averaged precipitation as a stochastic process improves parameter and input estimation

被引:37
作者
Del Giudice, Dario [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Albert, Carlo [1 ]
Rieckermann, Jorg [1 ]
Reichert, Peter [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Eawag, Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Carnegie Inst Sci, Dept Global Ecol, Stanford, CA USA
[4] ETH, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Biogeochem & Pollutant Dynam, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
CHAOHE BASIN; RAINFALL; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION; INFERENCE; CALIBRATION; RESOLUTION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1002/2015WR017871
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rainfall input uncertainty is one of the major concerns in hydrological modeling. Unfortunately, during inference, input errors are usually neglected, which can lead to biased parameters and implausible predictions. Rainfall multipliers can reduce this problem but still fail when the observed input (precipitation) has a different temporal pattern from the true one or if the true nonzero input is not detected. In this study, we propose an improved input error model which is able to overcome these challenges and to assess and reduce input uncertainty. We formulate the average precipitation over the watershed as a stochastic input process (SIP) and, together with a model of the hydrosystem, include it in the likelihood function. During statistical inference, we use "noisy'' input (rainfall) and output (runoff) data to learn about the "true'' rainfall, model parameters, and runoff. We test the methodology with the rainfall-discharge dynamics of a small urban catchment. To assess its advantages, we compare SIP with simpler methods of describing uncertainty within statistical inference: (i) standard least squares (LS), (ii) bias description (BD), and (iii) rainfall multipliers (RM). We also compare two scenarios: accurate versus inaccurate forcing data. Results show that when inferring the input with SIP and using inaccurate forcing data, the whole-catchment precipitation can still be realistically estimated and thus physical parameters can be "protected'' from the corrupting impact of input errors. While correcting the output rather than the input, BD inferred similarly unbiased parameters. This is not the case with LS and RM. During validation, SIP also delivers realistic uncertainty intervals for both rainfall and runoff. Thus, the technique presented is a significant step toward better quantifying input uncertainty in hydrological inference. As a next step, SIP will have to be combined with a technique addressing model structure uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:3162 / 3186
页数:25
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Ailliot P, 2015, J SFDS, V156, P101
  • [2] Influence of rainfall observation network on model calibration and application
    Bardossy, A.
    Das, T.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (01) : 77 - 89
  • [3] A framework for validation of computer models
    Bayarri, Maria J.
    Berger, James O.
    Paulo, Rui
    Sacks, Jerry
    Cafeo, John A.
    Cavendish, James
    Lin, Chin-Hsu
    Tu, Jian
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 2007, 49 (02) : 138 - 154
  • [4] On red herrings and real herrings: disinformation and information in hydrological inference
    Beven, Keith
    Westerberg, Ida
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2011, 25 (10) : 1676 - 1680
  • [5] Brooks S, 2011, CH CRC HANDB MOD STA, pXIX
  • [6] Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy
    Brynjarsdottir, Jenny
    O'Hagan, Anthony
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (11)
  • [7] Parsimonious hydrological modeling of urban sewer and river catchments
    Coutu, Sylvain
    Del Giudice, Dario
    Rossi, Luca
    Barry, D. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 464 : 477 - 484
  • [8] Stochastic point process modelling of rainfall .1. Single-site fitting and validation
    Cowpertwait, PSP
    OConnell, PE
    Metcalfe, AV
    Mawdsley, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1996, 175 (1-4) : 17 - 46
  • [9] Multifractal modeling of anomalous scaling laws in rainfall
    Deidda, R
    Benzi, R
    Siccardi, F
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (06) : 1853 - 1867
  • [10] Model bias and complexity - Understanding the effects of structural deficits and input errors on runoff predictions
    Del Giudice, D.
    Reichert, P.
    Bares, V.
    Albert, C.
    Rieckermann, J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 64 : 205 - 214