Next-Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening: A Review of Current State

被引:55
作者
Remec, Ziga I. [1 ]
Trebusak Podkrajsek, Katarina [1 ,2 ]
Repic Lampret, Barbka [1 ]
Kovac, Jernej [1 ]
Groselj, Urh [3 ,4 ]
Tesovnik, Tine [1 ]
Battelino, Tadej [3 ,4 ]
Debeljak, Marusa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Childrens Hosp, Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Clin Inst Special Lab Diagnost, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Inst Biochem & Mol Genet, Fac Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Childrens Hosp, Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Metab Dis, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Chair Pediat, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
newborn screening; NBS; neonatal screening; next generation sequencing; NGS; expanded NBS program; DNA sequencing; high-throughput sequencing; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; CYSTIC-FIBROSIS; SECONDARY FINDINGS; CLINICAL EXOME; CHILDREN; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; PROGRAM; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2021.662254
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Newborn screening was first introduced at the beginning of the 1960s with the successful implementation of the first phenylketonuria screening programs. Early expansion of the included disorders was slow because each additional disorder screened required a separate test. Subsequently, the technological advancements of biochemical methodology enabled the scaling-up of newborn screening, most notably with the implementation of tandem mass spectrometry. In recent years, we have witnessed a remarkable progression of high-throughput sequencing technologies, which has resulted in a continuous decrease of both cost and time required for genetic analysis. This has enabled more widespread use of the massive multiparallel sequencing. Genomic sequencing is now frequently used in clinical applications, and its implementation in newborn screening has been intensively advocated. The expansion of newborn screening has raised many clinical, ethical, legal, psychological, sociological, and technological concerns over time. This review provides an overview of the current state of next-generation sequencing regarding newborn screening including current recommendations and potential challenges for the use of such technologies in newborn screening.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
ACMG Board of Directors, 2013, Genet Med, V15, P748, DOI 10.1038/gim.2013.94
[2]   Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age:: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years [J].
Andermann, Anne ;
Blancquaert, Ingeborg ;
Beauchamp, Sylvie ;
Dery, Veronique .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2008, 86 (04) :317-319
[3]   The expansion and performance of national newborn screening programmes for cystic fibrosis in Europe [J].
Barben, Jurg ;
Castellani, Carlo ;
Dankert-Roelse, Jeannette ;
Gartner, Silvia ;
Kashirskaya, Nataliya ;
Linnane, Barry ;
Mayell, Sarah ;
Munck, Anne ;
Sands, Dorota ;
Sommerburg, Olaf ;
Pybus, Simon ;
Winters, Victoria ;
Southern, Kevin W. .
JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2017, 16 (02) :207-213
[4]   Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants [J].
Belkadi, Aziz ;
Bolze, Alexandre ;
Itan, Yuval ;
Cobat, Aurelie ;
Vincent, Quentin B. ;
Antipenko, Alexander ;
Shang, Lei ;
Boisson, Bertrand ;
Casanova, Jean-Laurent ;
Abel, Laurent .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (17) :5473-5478
[5]  
Bennett MJ, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P1145
[6]   Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health [J].
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Agrawal, Pankaj B. ;
Bailey, Donald B., Jr. ;
Beggs, Alan H. ;
Brenner, Steven E. ;
Brower, Amy M. ;
Cakici, Julie A. ;
Ceyhan-Birsoy, Ozge ;
Chan, Kee ;
Chen, Flavia ;
Currier, Robert J. ;
Dukhovny, Dmitry ;
Green, Robert C. ;
Harris-Wai, Julie ;
Holm, Ingrid A. ;
Iglesias, Brenda ;
Joseph, Galen ;
Kingsmore, Stephen F. ;
Koenig, Barbara A. ;
Kwok, Pui-Yan ;
Lantos, John ;
Leeder, Steven J. ;
Lewis, Megan A. ;
McGuire, Amy L. ;
Milko, Laura V. ;
Mooney, Sean D. ;
Parad, Richard B. ;
Pereira, Stacey ;
Petrikin, Joshua ;
Powell, Bradford C. ;
Powell, Cynthia M. ;
Puck, Jennifer M. ;
Rehm, Heidi L. ;
Risch, Neil ;
Roche, Myra ;
Shieh, Joseph T. ;
Veeraraghavan, Narayanan ;
Watson, Michael S. ;
Willig, Laurel ;
Yu, Timothy W. ;
Urv, Tiina ;
Wise, Anastasia L. .
PEDIATRICS, 2017, 139 (02)
[7]   A semiquantitative metric for evaluating clinical actionability of incidental or secondary findings from genome-scale sequencing [J].
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Foreman, Ann Katherine M. ;
O'Daniel, Julianne M. ;
Booker, Jessica K. ;
Boshe, Lacey ;
Carey, Timothy ;
Crooks, Kristy R. ;
Jensen, Brian C. ;
Juengst, Eric T. ;
Lee, Kristy ;
Nelson, Daniel K. ;
Powell, Bradford C. ;
Powell, Cynthia M. ;
Roche, Myra I. ;
Skrzynia, Cecile ;
Strande, Natasha T. ;
Weck, Karen E. ;
Wilhelmsen, Kirk C. ;
Evans, James P. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (05) :467-475
[8]   Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing [J].
Best, Sunayna ;
Wou, Karen ;
Vora, Neeta ;
Van der Veyver, Ignatia B. ;
Wapner, Ronald ;
Chitty, Lyn S. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 38 (01) :10-19
[9]   Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening [J].
Bombard, Yvonne ;
Miller, Fiona A. ;
Hayeems, Robin Z. ;
Avard, Denise ;
Knoppers, Bartha M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2010, 18 (07) :751-760
[10]  
Bondio M.G., 2017, MED ETHICS PREDICTIO, V1st Edn