Ecosystem services and US stormwater planning: An approach for improving urban stormwater decisions

被引:48
作者
BenDor, Todd K. [1 ,2 ]
Shandas, Vivek [3 ]
Miles, Brian [4 ]
Belt, Kenneth [5 ]
Olander, Lydia [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, New East Bldg,Campus Box 3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, UNC Inst Environm, New East Bldg,Campus Box 3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Portland State Univ, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Inst Environm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] USDA Forest Serv, Northern Res Stn, Baltimore Field Stn, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Environmental planning; Ecosystem services; Stormwater planning; Green infrastructure; Stormwater infrastructure; Low impact development; LAND-USE; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; REGIONAL PLANNERS; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; SYSTEMS; URBANIZATION; DESIGN; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green stormwater infrastructure (GI) is gaining traction as a viable complement to traditional "gray" infrastructure in cities across the United States. As cities struggle with decisions to replace deteriorating stormwater infrastructure in the face of looming issues such as population growth and climate change, GI may offer a cost-effective, efficient, and sustainable approach. However, decision makers confront challenges when integrating GI within city plans, including uncertainties around GI capacity and maintenance, resistance to collaboration across city governance, increasingly inflexible financing, accounting practices that do not incorporate the multiple values of GI, and difficulties in incorporating ecological infrastructure into stormwater management. This paper presents an ecosystem services framework for assessing the context-specific needs of decision makers, while considering the strengths and limitations of GI use in urban stormwater management. We describe multiple dimensions of the planning system, identify points of intervention, and illustrate two applications of our framework - Durham, North Carolina and Portland, Oregon (USA). In these case studies, we apply our ecosystem services framework to explicitly consider tradeoffs to assist planning professionals who are considering implementation of GI. We conclude by offering a research agenda that explores opportunities for further evaluations of GI design, implementation, and maintenance in cities.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 103
页数:12
相关论文
共 163 条
[1]   The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation [J].
Ahern, Jack ;
Cilliers, Sarel ;
Niemela, Jari .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 125 :254-259
[2]  
Albert C, 2014, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V29, P1301, DOI [10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0, 10.1007/s10980-014-9990-5]
[3]   Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems [J].
Allan, JD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2004, 35 :257-284
[4]  
Andrew ME, 2014, PROG PHYS GEOG, V38, P328, DOI 10.1177/0309133314528942
[5]  
[Anonymous], FOLL PHAS WORK PACK
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SOLUTIONS
[7]  
[Anonymous], PORTL NAM AM GREEN C
[8]  
[Anonymous], S ELL STORMW PROJ
[9]  
[Anonymous], LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY SU
[10]  
[Anonymous], F A Q FREQ ASK QUEST