Immunohistochemical Study of BCL2 Protein, Oestrogen Receptor Alpha and Oestrogen Receptor Beta Expression in Adenocarcinoma Prostate and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

被引:0
作者
Appukuttan, Aria Jyothi [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt TD Med Coll, Dept Pathol, Alappuzha, Kerala, India
来源
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS | 2021年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
Oestrogen Receptors; BCL-2; Carcinoma Prostate; Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; Immuno Histochemical Staining; Gleason Score; CANCER; APOPTOSIS; BAX; RESISTANCE; TISSUE; LNCAP; ROLES;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2021/39
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Oestrogens are involved in the prostate carcinogenesis and neoplastic progression. Overproduction of B-Cell Lymphoma-2 Gene (BCL2) protein contributes to inhibition of apoptosis, prolongation of cell cycle and neoplastic expansion. In this study, the investigator has tried to characterize the expression of BCL2 in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and adenocarcinoma prostate and tried to assess the role of BCL2 as a prognostic factor in carcinoma prostate by comparing with Gleason score. Another objective was to study the oestrogen receptor alpha and beta expression in adenocarcinoma prostate. METHODS In this retrospective study, immunostaining of BCL2 is done in carcinoma prostate and BPH and compared with Gleason score. Immunohistochemical staining of oestrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) and oestrogen receptor beta (ER 13) were studied in stromal and epithelial cells of carcinoma prostate and BPH. RESULTS A total of 35 cases of adenocarcinoma and 35 cases of BPH was studied. 13 high grade adenocarcinoma and 2 intermediate carcinoma and 10 cases of BPH showed BCL-2 positivity. ER 13 was present in epithelium in all cases and in stroma of 15 cases of carcinoma. In BPH, ER 13 was present in the epithelium of 21 cases and in stroma of 8 cases. ER alpha was present in epithelium in 3 cases and in stroma of 10 cases of carcinoma. In BPH, ER alpha is present in the epithelium of 21 cases and in stroma of 8 cases. CONCLUSIONS All prostatic carcinoma with a high Gleason grade showed BCL-2 positivity. This suggests that BCL-2 positivity in prostatic carcinoma may be considered as a prognostic marker. The ER 13 expression in epithelium of prostate carcinoma is much higher compared to BPH with a significant P value < 0.01. This reveals the role of ER 13 expression in proliferating and neoplastic prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 184
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Al-Maghrabi JA, 2010, AFR J UROL, V16, P79, DOI 10.1007/s12301-010-0018-3
[2]  
BERCHEM GJ, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P735
[3]  
Bosland Maarten C, 2005, Rev Urol, V7 Suppl 3, pS4
[4]  
Bubendorf L, 1996, AM J PATHOL, V148, P1557
[5]   BCL-2 in prostate cancer: A minireview [J].
Catz, SD ;
Johnson, JL .
APOPTOSIS, 2003, 8 (01) :29-37
[6]   Estrogen Receptors β1 and β2 Have Opposing Roles in Regulating Proliferation and Bone Metastasis Genes in the Prostate Cancer Cell Line PC3 [J].
Dey, Prasenjit ;
Jonsson, Philip ;
Hartman, Johan ;
Williams, Cecilia ;
Stroem, Anders ;
Gustafsson, Jan-Ake .
MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 26 (12) :1991-2003
[7]   Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists [J].
Egevad, Lars ;
Ahmad, Amar S. ;
Algaba, Ferran ;
Berney, Daniel M. ;
Boccon-Gibod, Liliane ;
Comperat, Eva ;
Evans, Andrew J. ;
Griffiths, David ;
Grobholz, Rainer ;
Kristiansen, Glen ;
Langner, Cord ;
Lopez-Beltran, Antonio ;
Montironi, Rodolfo ;
Moss, Sue ;
Oliveira, Pedro ;
Vainer, Ben ;
Varma, Murali ;
Camparo, Philippe .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 62 (02) :247-256
[8]   Differential expression of the estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) in human prostate tissue, premalignant changes, and in primary, metastatic, and recurrent prostatic adenocarcinoma [J].
Fixemer, T ;
Remberger, K ;
Bonkhoff, H .
PROSTATE, 2003, 54 (02) :79-87
[9]  
Gabal Samia M, 2007, J Egypt Natl Canc Inst, V19, P239
[10]   The E1B 19K protein blocks apoptosis by interacting with and inhibiting the p53-inducible and death-promoting Bax protein [J].
Han, JH ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Perez, D ;
Rao, L ;
Modha, D ;
White, E .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 10 (04) :461-477