Cultural adaptation and validation of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for Turkish use

被引:8
作者
Seyyah, Mine [1 ]
Yurdalan, Saadet Ufuk [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar Educ & Res Hosp, Burn & Wound Treatment Dept, Semsi Denizer St,E-5 Karayolu Cevizli Mevkii, TR-34890 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Physiotherapy & Rehabil Dept, Maltepe Basibuyuk Yolu St,9-4-1 Maltepe, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale; Hypertrophic scar; Physiotherapy; Validity; Reliability; RELIABILITY; POSAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.026
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to evaluate cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for its Turkish use. Method: This study included 50 burn patients with hypertrophic scars who were aged 18-65 years (mean, 37.5 +/- 1.4years) and were admitted to Wound and Burn Treatment Center from February 2014 to April 2014. With regard to the cultural adaptation of POSAS from English to Turkish, the scale was translated by two people who worked in different health fields. POSAS was administered to the patients with a 1-week interval to evaluate the validity and reliability of the scale. Internal consistency of the scale was tested using the Cronbach alphamethod. Results: The Cronbach alpha value for the observer measurements was found to be 0.93 (excellent), and that for patient measurements was found to be 0.77 (good). Accordingly, the internal consistency of the scale was established. Conclusion: The Turkish version of POSAS is a valid, reliable and culturally appropriate survey for evaluating hypertrophic scars. We believe that the Turkish version of POSAS will be an important clinical/scientific tool in the field of burn physiotherapy in Turkey, which will lead to new researches in this field. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1352 / 1356
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Buyukozturk S., 2017, Pegem Atif Indeks, V2017, P1, DOI DOI 10.14527/9789944919289
  • [2] Reliability of photographic analysis in determining change in scar appearance
    Crowe, JM
    Simpson, K
    Johnson, W
    Allen, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 1998, 19 (02): : 183 - 186
  • [3] Patient opinion of scarring is multidimensional: An investigation of the POSAS with confirmatory factor analysis
    DeJong, Helen M.
    Phillips, Michael
    Edgar, Dale W.
    Wood, Fiona M.
    [J]. BURNS, 2017, 43 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [4] Deslauriers V, 2009, CAN J SURG, V52, pE259
  • [5] Draaijers LJ, PLAST RECONSTR SURG
  • [6] Current scales for assessing human scarring: A review
    Durani, Piyush
    McGrouther, D. A.
    Ferguson, M. W. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (06) : 713 - 720
  • [7] Fearmonti R, 2010, EPLASTY, V10, P354
  • [8] Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures
    Garratt, AN
    Schmidt, L
    Mackintosh, A
    Fitzpatrick, R
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7351): : 1417 - 1419
  • [9] The patient-specific functional scale:: Validity in workers' compensation claimants
    Gross, Douglas P.
    Battie, Michele C.
    Asante, Alexander K.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (07): : 1294 - 1299
  • [10] Development and testing of a self-report instrument to measure actions: Outpatient physical therapy improvement assessment log (OPTIMAL)
    Guccione, AA
    Mielenz, TJ
    DeVellis, RF
    Goldstein, MS
    Freburger, JK
    Pietrobon, R
    Miller, SC
    Callahan, LF
    Harwood, K
    Carey, TS
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2005, 85 (06): : 515 - 530