Factors of electric vehicle adoption: A comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior

被引:206
作者
Haustein, Sonja [1 ]
Jensen, Anders Fjendbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Engn Management, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Attitude; electric vehicles; intention; personal norm; subjective norm; CONSUMER ATTITUDES; DIRECT EXPERIENCE; USAGE INTENTION; TRAVEL MODE; CHOICE; PREFERENCES; TRANSPORTATION; DETERMINANTS; WILLINGNESS; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1080/15568318.2017.1398790
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasing the share of battery electric vehicles (BEV) in the total car fleet is regarded as a promising way to reduce local car emissions. Based on online surveys in Denmark and Sweden, this study compares BEV users' (n = 673) and conventional vehicle (CV) users' (n = 1794) socio-demographic profiles, attitudinal profiles, and mobility patterns. In line with previous research, BEV users are typically male, highly educated, have high incomes, and often more than one car in their household. Additionally, BEV users perceive less functional barriers toward BEV use and have more positive attitudes and norms than CV users. The different profiles of these user groups suggest a separate analysis of potential factors of BEV adoption in both groups. In regression analyses, CV and BEV users' intention to use/purchase a BEV is modeled based on factors of the Theory of Planned Behavior extended by personal norm, perceived mobility necessities, and BEV experience. For CV users, symbolic attitudes related to BEVs are the most important factor of intention, while perceived functional barriers in terms of driving range are most relevant for BEV users' intention. How BEV users cope with trips of longer distance seems of particular relevance. In multiple car households, we found the percentage of actual BEV usage related to the type of other cars in the household, perceived functional barriers of BEVs as well as (successful) behavioral adaption to longer trips by BEVs. Based on the results, we discuss ways to increase BEV adoption for current users and non-users.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 496
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Ajzen I., 2006, [No title captured]
[3]   All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes [J].
Anable, J ;
Gatersleben, B .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 39 (2-3) :163-181
[4]  
Autobranchen, 2017, NYT AUT DANM NO 7, P22
[5]   Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Ajzen, I ;
Schmidt, P .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 25 (03) :175-187
[6]   Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study [J].
Beirao, Gabriela ;
Cabral, J. A. Sarsfield .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2007, 14 (06) :478-489
[7]   Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway [J].
Bjerkan, Kristin Ystmark ;
Norbech, Tom E. ;
Nordtomme, Marianne Elvsaas .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 43 :169-180
[8]   Transport and climate change: a review [J].
Chapman, Lee .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 15 (05) :354-367
[9]  
Danish Electric Vehicle Alliance, 2017, MAN SALGST ELB DANM
[10]   Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions [J].
Egbue, Ona ;
Long, Suzanna .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 48 :717-729