Enhancing the Taxonomies Relating to Academic Integrity and Misconduct

被引:20
作者
Tauginiene, Loreta [1 ]
Gaizauskaite, Inga [2 ]
Razi, Salim [3 ]
Glendinning, Irene [4 ]
Sivasubramaniam, Shivadas [5 ]
Marino, Franca [6 ]
Cosentino, Marco [6 ]
Anohina-Naumeca, Alla [7 ]
Kravjar, Julius [8 ]
机构
[1] Hanken Sch Econ, Arkadiankatu 22, Helsinki 00100, Finland
[2] Lithuanian Social Res Ctr, A Gostauto G 9, LT-01108 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, TR-17100 Belediyesi Canakkale Mer, Kepez, Turkey
[4] Coventry Univ, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Derby, Kedleston Rd, Derby DE22 1GB, England
[6] Univ Insubria, Via Ottorino Rossi 9, I-21100 Varese, Italy
[7] Riga Tech Univ, Daugavgrivas St 25, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
[8] Slovak Ctr Sci & Tech Informat, Lamacska Cesta 8A, Bratislava 81104, Slovakia
关键词
Academic integrity; Academic misconduct; Taxonomy; Research integrity; Research misconduct; Qualitative content analysis; Concept analysis; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; PLAGIARISM; DEFINITIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10805-019-09342-4
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A clear understanding of terminology is crucial in any academic field. When it is clear that complex interdisciplinary concepts are interpreted differently depending on the academic field, geographical setting or cultural values, it is time to take action. Given this, the Glossary for Academic Integrity, newly developed by the European Network for Academic Integrity project, served as the basis for compiling a comprehensive taxonomy of terms related to academic integrity. Following a rigorous coding exercise, the taxonomy was partitioned into three constituent components - Integrity, Misconduct and Neutral terms. A review of relevant literature sources is included, and the strengths and weaknesses of existing taxonomies are discussed in relation to this new offering. During the creation of these artefacts the authors identified and resolved many differences between their individual interpretative understandings of concepts/terms and the viewpoints of others. It is anticipated that the freely-available glossary and taxonomy will be explored and valued by researchers, teachers, students and the general public alike.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 361
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   'It's not fair': policy discourses and students' understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university [J].
Adam, Lee ;
Anderson, Vivienne ;
Spronken-Smith, Rachel .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (01) :17-32
[2]   The effect of scientific misconduct on the results of clinical trials: A Delphi survey [J].
Al-Marzouki, S ;
Roberts, I ;
Marshall, T ;
Evans, S .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 26 (03) :331-337
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR
[5]  
Bamford J., 2005, Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, V2, P17
[6]   Who's Afraid of Peer Review? [J].
Bohannon, John .
SCIENCE, 2013, 342 (6154) :60-65
[7]  
Bretag T, 2016, HANDBOOK OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_76
[8]   Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use? [J].
Bretag T. ;
Mahmud S. .
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2009, 7 (3) :193-205
[9]   Self-reports of student cheating: Does a definition of cheating matter? [J].
Burrus, Robert T. ;
McGoldrick, KirnMarie ;
Schuhmann, Peter W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2007, 38 (01) :3-16
[10]  
Carrell P.L., 1988, INTERACTIVE APPROACH, P101