CONSUMER CULTURE OF ABUNDANCE - AMBIVALENCE OF LIFE IN AN AFFLUENT SOCIETY

被引:0
作者
Roubal, Ondrej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Finance & Adm Prague, Fac Econ Studies, Estonska 500, Prague 10100 10, Czech Republic
来源
MARKETING IDENTITY: COVID-2.0 | 2020年
关键词
Affluence; Ambivalence; Consumer Culture; Consumer Decision-Making; Problem of Choice;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Theories of consumer culture are increasingly focusing on the unprecedented extension of choice opportunities in the product range. In the ever-increasing abundance of consumer elections, consumer culture is a defining feature of prosperity, a manifestation of the strengthening of individual freedoms and the democratisation of consumerism. The aim of the study is to disrupt the stereotypically accepted perspective of producers, sellers and consumers themselves, that the consumer culture of abundance is a problem-free concept that linearly contributes to the positive effects of all market entities. This situation is characteristic in that its ambivalent nature is reflected only rarely. In many cases, it causes contradictory and conflicting effects in the lives of consumers, exposed to the confusing and diverse terrain of the plurality of consumer choices. The expansion of consumer decision-making possibilities creates an unpleasant pressure on consumers to take responsibility for the making their own decisions for their consequences. The consumer culture of abundance fundamentally complicates the decision-making and implementation of consumer choices. We present arguments here that the consumer culture of abundance makes decision-making act fundamentally problematic. We describe and explain the three main factors that have a negative effect on the psychological level of consumer decision- making. Firstly, there is the problem of processing and evaluating available information, secondly, the growth of consumer aspirations and thirdly, the effect of hedonistic adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 565
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, UMENI ZIVOTA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Globalization: A Critical Introduction
[3]  
BAUDRILLARD J, 1999, SIMULAKER SIMULACIJA
[4]  
Bauman Z., 2004, INDIVIDUALIZOVANA SP
[5]  
Brickman P., 1971, ADAPTATION LEVEL THE, P287, DOI DOI 10.3389/FPSYG.2018.01158
[6]  
Lipovetsky G., 2013, Hypermoderni doba. Od pozitku k uzkosti The Hypermodern times. From pleasure to anxiety
[7]  
Lipovetsky G., 2003, Era prazdnoty: Uvahy o soucasnem individualismu
[8]  
MLCOCH L., 2005, EKONOMIE STESTI PROC
[9]  
Petrusek M, 2010, SOCIOL CAS, V46, P801
[10]  
Roberts Kenneth., 1999, LEISURE CONT SOC