Where ?fake news? flourishes: a comparison across four Western democracies

被引:149
作者
Humprecht, Edda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Commun & Media Res, Andreas St 15, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Disinformation; polarization; partisanship; international comparison; content analysis; SOCIAL MEDIA; PUBLIC-OPINION; TRUST; POLARIZATION; DIFFUSION; DISTRUST; AMERICAN; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/1369118X.2018.1474241
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
How does the content of so-called ?fake news? differ across Western democracies? While previous research on online disinformation has focused on the individual level, the current study aims to shed light on cross-national differences. It compares online disinformation re-published by fact checkers from four Western democracies (the US, the UK, Germany, and Austria). The findings reveal significant differences between English-speaking and German-speaking countries. In the US and the UK, the largest shares of partisan disinformation are found, while in Germany and Austria sensationalist stories prevail. Moreover, in English-speaking countries, disinformation frequently attacks political actors, whereas in German-speaking countries, immigrants are most frequently targeted. Across all of the countries, topics of false stories strongly mirror national news agendas. Based on these results, the paper argues that online disinformation is not only a technology-driven phenomenon but also shaped by national information environments.
引用
收藏
页码:1973 / 1988
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]  
Pfetsch B., 2012, The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research, P25
[42]   You Cannot be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions [J].
Prior, Markus ;
Sood, Gaurav ;
Khanna, Kabir .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (04) :489-518
[43]   Elite Polarization and Public Opinion: How Polarization Is Communicated and Its Effects [J].
Robison, Joshua ;
Mullinix, Kevin J. .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2016, 33 (02) :261-282
[44]  
Ross L, 1996, J PIAGET SY, P103
[45]  
Schweiger W., 2017, DES INFORMIERTE BURG, DOI [10.1007/978-3-658-16058-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-16058-6]
[46]  
Scriber B., 2016, WHO DECIDES WHATS TR, P1
[47]   Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction [J].
Shin, Jieun ;
Jian, Lian ;
Driscoll, Kevin ;
Bar, Francois .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2017, 19 (08) :1214-1235
[48]   Partisan Selective Sharing: The Biased Diffusion of Fact-Checking Messages on Social Media [J].
Shin, Jieun ;
Thorson, Kjerstin .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2017, 67 (02) :233-255
[49]   Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon [J].
Swire, Briony ;
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Lewandowsky, Stephan ;
Ecker, Ullrich K. H. .
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2017, 4 (03)
[50]   DEFINING "FAKE NEWS" A typology of scholarly definitions [J].
Tandoc, Edson C., Jr. ;
Lim, Zheng Wei ;
Ling, Richard .
DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2018, 6 (02) :137-153