Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative 125I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization

被引:30
作者
Dryden, Mark J. [1 ]
Dogan, Basak E. [1 ]
Fox, Patricia [2 ]
Wang, Cuiyan [1 ,3 ]
Black, Dalliah M. [4 ]
Hunt, Kelly [4 ]
Yang, Wei Tse [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 1350, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Shandong Med Imaging Res Inst, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
I-125 seed localization; breast cancer; mammography; ultrasound-guided wire localization; wire localization; CONSERVING SURGERY; NEEDLE LOCALIZATION; BIOPSY; CANCER; LUMPECTOMY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.15.14715
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to compare the potential influence of imaging variables on surgical margins after preoperative radioactive seed localization (RSL) and wire localization (WL) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 565 women with 660 breast lesions underwent RSL or WL between May 16, 2012, and May 30, 2013. Patient age, lesion type (mass, calcifications, mass with associated calcifications, other), lesion size, number of seeds or wires used, surgical margin status (close positive or negative margins), and reexcision and mastectomy rates were recorded. RESULTS. Of 660 lesions, 127 (19%) underwent RSL and 533 (81%) underwent WL preoperatively. Mean lesion size was 1.8 cm in the RSL group and 1.8 cm in the WL group (p = 0.35). No difference in lesion type was identified in the RSL and WL groups (p = 0.63). RSL with a single seed was used in 105 of 127 (83%) RSLs compared with WL with a single wire in 349 of 533 (65%) WLs (p = 0.0003). The number of cases with a close positive margin was similar for RSLs (26/127, 20%) and WLs (104/533, 20%) (p = 0.81). There was no difference between the RSL group and the WL group in close positive margin status (20% each, p = 0.81), reexcision rates (20% vs 16%, respectively; p = 0.36), or mastectomy rates (6% each, p = 0.96). Lesions containing calcifications were more likely to require more than one wire (odds ratio [OR], 4.44; 95% CI, 2.8-7.0) or more than one seed (OR, 7.03; 95% CI, 1.6-30.0) when compared with masses alone (p < 0.0001). Increasing lesion size and the presence of calcifications were significant predictors of positive margins, whereas the use of more than one wire or seed was not (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.5) (p = 0.75). CONCLUSION. Close positive margin, reexcision, and mastectomy rates remained similar in the WL group and RSL group. The presence of calcifications and increasing lesion size increased the odds of a close positive margin in both the WL and RSL groups, whereas the use of one versus more than one seed or wire did not.
引用
收藏
页码:1112 / 1118
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast cancer [J].
Barentsz, M. W. ;
van den Bosch, M. A. A. J. ;
Veldhuis, W. B. ;
van Diest, P. J. ;
Pijnappel, R. M. ;
Witkamp, A. J. ;
Verkooijen, H. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (05) :582-588
[2]   Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery [J].
Cabioglu, Neslihan ;
Hunt, Kelly K. ;
Sahin, Aysegul A. ;
Kuerer, Henry M. ;
Babiera, Gildy V. ;
Singletary, S. Eva ;
Whitman, Gary J. ;
Ross, Merrick I. ;
Ames, Frederick C. ;
Feig, Barry W. ;
Buchholz, Thomas A. ;
Meric-Bernstam, Funda .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) :1458-1471
[3]  
Cady B, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P301
[4]   Wire-directed localization biopsy of the breast: An audit of results and analysis of factors influencing therapeutic value in the treatment of breast cancer [J].
Chadwick, DR ;
Shorthouse, AJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 23 (02) :128-133
[5]   Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery [J].
Chagpar, A ;
Yen, T ;
Sahin, A ;
Hunt, KK ;
Whitman, GJ ;
Ames, FC ;
Ross, MI ;
Meric-Bernstam, F ;
Babiera, GV ;
Singletary, SE ;
Kuerer, HM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 186 (04) :371-377
[6]   MIGRATION OF BREAST BIOPSY LOCALIZATION WIRE [J].
DAVIS, PS ;
WECHSLER, RJ ;
FEIG, SA ;
MARCH, DE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 150 (04) :787-788
[7]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[8]   Localizing High-Risk Lesions for Excisional Breast Biopsy: A Comparison Between Radioactive Seed Localization and Wire Localization [J].
Diego, Emilia J. ;
Soran, Atilla ;
McGuire, Kandace P. ;
Costellic, Corinne ;
Johnson, Ronald R. ;
Bonaventura, Marguerite ;
Ahrendt, Gretchen M. ;
McAuliffe, Priscilla F. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (10) :3268-3272
[9]   Specimen radiography in confirmation of MRI-guided needle localization and surgical excision of breast lesions [J].
Erguvan-Dogan, Basak ;
Whitman, Gary J. ;
Nguyen, Victoria A. ;
Dryden, Mark J. ;
Stafford, R. Jason ;
Hazle, John ;
McAlee, Krista R. ;
Phelps, Michael J. ;
Ice, Mary F. ;
Kuerer, Henry M. ;
Middleton, Lavinia P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (02) :339-344
[10]  
Gray RJ, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P711