Shade tolerance plasticity in response to neutral vs green shade cues in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth

被引:68
作者
Griffith, TM [1 ]
Sultan, SE [1 ]
机构
[1] Wesleyan Univ, Dept Biol, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
关键词
available PAR; light cues; neutral shade; phenotypic plasticity; Polygonum hydropiper; Polygonum persicaria; R : FR ratio;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01277.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Here we examined species differences in perception and response to two distinct types of shade cue, reduced photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) with and without reduced red : far red ratio (R : FR), in Polygonum persicaria and Polygonum hydropiper, two closely related annuals of contrasting ecological breadth. We compared plasticity data for light-gathering traits from glasshouse experiments at equivalently reduced PAR under neutral shade (R : FR 1.03) and green shade (R : FR 0.702). Species shared the ability to distinguish between the two types of shade, as shown by the ability of each to respond differently to neutral vs green shade for one or more traits. However, the species' responses to these cues differed significantly. Polygonum persicaria expressed stronger shade-tolerance responses (increased leaf allocation and leaf area ratio) to reduced PAR alone than to green shade. By contrast, P. hydropiper expressed slightly less plasticity for these traits in neutral than in green shade. The pronounced plastic response of P. persicaria to neutral shade may contribute to the range of habitats this widespread species can occupy, which includes neutral-shade environments such as urban settings.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Statistical methods
[2]  
Bazzaz F.A., 1996, Plants in changing environments: Linking physiological, population, and community ecology
[3]   Developmental phenotypic plasticity: Where ecology and evolution meet molecular biology [J].
Callahan, HS ;
Pigliucci, M ;
Schlichting, CD .
BIOESSAYS, 1997, 19 (06) :519-525
[4]  
Callahan HS, 1999, EVOL ECOL RES, V1, P731
[5]   PLANT-RESPONSES TO MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS [J].
CHAPIN, FS ;
BLOOM, AJ ;
FIELD, CB ;
WARING, RH .
BIOSCIENCE, 1987, 37 (01) :49-57
[6]  
Cronquist A, 1991, MANUAL VASCULAR PLAN
[7]   Adaptive plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis:: Response of Scaphiopus hammondii tadpoles to habitat desiccation [J].
Denver, RJ ;
Mirhadi, N ;
Phillips, M .
ECOLOGY, 1998, 79 (06) :1859-1872
[8]   Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity [J].
DeWitt, TJ ;
Sih, A ;
Wilson, DS .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (02) :77-81
[9]  
Dixon Philip M., 1993, P290
[10]  
Dorn LA, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P1982, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01242.x