The Effectiveness of Endoscopic Gastroplasty for Obesity Treatment According to FDA Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:11
作者
Madruga-Neto, Antonio Coutinho [1 ]
Bernardo, Wanderley Marques [1 ]
Hourneaux de Moura, Diogo Turiani [1 ]
Brunaldi, Vitor Ottoboni [1 ]
Martins, Rafael Krieger [1 ]
Josino, Iatagan Rocha [1 ]
Hourneaux de Moura, Eduardo Turiani [1 ]
de Souza, Thiago Ferreira [1 ]
Santo, Marco Aurelio [2 ]
Hourneaux de Moura, Eduardo Guimares [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Med Sch, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Dr Arnaldo Av 455, BR-01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Med Sch, Bariatr & Metab Surg Unit, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Obesity; Gastroplasty; Endoscopy; Endoluminal therapy; Endoscopic therapy; Endoscopic suture; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; BARIATRIC SURGERY; WEIGHT-LOSS; INTRAGASTRIC BALLOON; METABOLIC THERAPIES; MEDICAL THERAPY; TERM OUTCOMES; QUALITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-018-3335-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) are promising alternatives to conventional surgery for obesity. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy and safety through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the endoscopic gastroplasty techniques versus conservative treatment. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Lilacs/Bireme. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling obese patients comparing endoscopic gastroplasty to sham or diet/exercise were considered eligible. Among 6014 records, three RCTs were selected for meta-analysis. The total sample was 459 patients (312 EBTs vs 147 control). Mean total body weight loss in the intervention group (IG) was 4.8% higher than the control group (CG) at 12 months (p = 0.01). The IG responder rate was 44.31% at 12 months. Therefore, the endoscopic gastroplasty is more effective than conservative therapies but do not achieve FDA thresholds.
引用
收藏
页码:2932 / 2940
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Clinical Practice Update: Expert Review on Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies [J].
Abu Dayyeh, Barham K. ;
Edmundowicz, Steven ;
Thompson, Chris C. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (04) :716-729
[2]   ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies [J].
Abu Dayyeh, Barham K. ;
Kumar, Nitin ;
Edmundowicz, Steven A. ;
Jonnalagadda, Sreenivasa ;
Larsen, Michael ;
Sullivan, Shelby ;
Thompson, Christopher C. ;
Banerjee, Subhas .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (03) :425-+
[3]  
[Anonymous], BRAZ OB GUID 2016
[4]  
[Anonymous], STANDARD ERROR MEAN
[5]   Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery [J].
Brethauer, Stacy A. ;
Kim, Julie ;
el Chaar, Maher ;
Papasavas, Pavlos ;
Eisenberg, Dan ;
Rogers, Ann ;
Ballem, Naveen ;
Kligman, Mark ;
Kothari, Shanu .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2015, 11 (03) :489-506
[6]   Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2011 [J].
Buchwald, Henry ;
Oien, Danette M. .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2013, 23 (04) :427-436
[7]   The Effectiveness and Risks of Bariatric Surgery An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2003-2012 [J].
Chang, Su-Hsin ;
Stoll, Carolyn R. T. ;
Song, Jihyun ;
Varela, J. Esteban ;
Eagon, Christopher J. ;
Colditz, Graham A. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (03) :275-287
[8]   A complications-based clinical staging of obesity to guide treatment modality and intensity [J].
Daniel, Sunil ;
Soleymani, Taraneh ;
Garvey, W. Timothy .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY, 2013, 20 (05) :377-388
[9]   Bariatric surgery: A review of procedures and outcomes [J].
Elder, Katherine A. ;
Wolfe, Bruce M. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (06) :2253-2271
[10]   Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Then and Now: An Updated Systematic Review of the Progress and Short-term Outcomes Over the Last 5 Years [J].
Emile, Sameh H. ;
Elfeki, Hossam ;
Elalfy, Khaled ;
Abdallah, Emad .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (05) :307-317