Comparison of five sarcopenia screening tools in preoperative patients with gastric cancer using the diagnostic criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2

被引:9
作者
Lu, Jin-ling [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Qin [1 ]
Zhu, Shu-qin [1 ]
Chen, Li [2 ]
Ding, Ling-yu [1 ]
Hua, Hong-xia [3 ]
Xu, Xin-yi [4 ]
Hu, Jie-man [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Gastr Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Metab Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gastric cancer; Sarcopenia; Screen; EWGSOP2; SARC-F;
D O I
10.1016/j.nut.2021.111553
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of five sarcopenia screening tools in preoperative patients with gastric cancer, including strength, assistance with walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and falls; strength, assistance with walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, falls, and calf circumference (SARC-CalF); Ishii score chart; short version of the mini sarcopenia risk assessment; and full version of the mini sarcopenia risk assessment.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of consecutive patients undergoing a gastrectomy between May 2020 and October 2020. Sarcopenia was diagnosed per the diagnostic criteria proposed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2). Data on the five sarcopenia screening tools, patient characteristics, nutrition risk screening 2002, and diagnostic indicators of sarcopenia were collected preoperatively, and pathological characteristics of the tumor were collected postoperatively. Based on the EWGSOP2 criteria, the clinical validity of the sarcopenia tools was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. A receiver operator characteristic curve and area under curve were applied to compare the overall screening accuracy, and a Youden index was calculated to determine the optimal cutoff value of each tool.Results: We included 260 participants age 62.38 </n> 11.21 y. Based on the EWGSOP2 criteria, the prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia were 8.46% and 4.62%, respectively. Moreover, the prevalence of sarcopenia risk ranged from 3.46% to 73.85% based on the five screening tools. Of these tools, SARC-CalF had the largest area under the curve (0.896) with moderate-to-high sensitivity (86.36%) and high specificity (92.86%). For SARC-CalF, the cutoff value of 10 reached the highest Youden index, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 81.82% and 93.44%, respectively. Conclusion: Among the above five screening tools, SARC-CalF appeared to be the optimal choice to screen sarcopenia in preoperative patients with gastric cancer.(c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for the Assessment of Sarcopenia in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review [J].
Aleixo, Gabriel F. P. ;
Shachar, Shlomit S. ;
Nyrop, Kirsten A. ;
Muss, Hyman B. ;
Battaglini, Claudio L. ;
Williams, Grant R. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2020, 25 (02) :170-182
[2]   Prognostic value of a rapid sarcopenia measure in acutely ill older adults [J].
Aliberti, Marlon J. R. ;
Szlejf, Claudia ;
Covinsky, Kenneth E. ;
Lee, Sei J. ;
Jacob-Filho, Wilson ;
Suemoto, Claudia K. .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2020, 39 (07) :2114-2120
[3]   Cut-off points to identify sarcopenia according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition [J].
Bahat, Gulistan ;
Tufan, Asli ;
Tufan, Fatih ;
Kilic, Cihan ;
Akpinar, Timur Selcuk ;
Kose, Murat ;
Erten, Nilgun ;
Karan, Mehmet Akif ;
Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J. .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2016, 35 (06) :1557-1563
[4]   Enhancing SARC-F: Improving Sarcopenia Screening in the Clinical Practice [J].
Barbosa-Silva, Thiago Gonzalez ;
Baptista Menezes, Ana Maria ;
Bielemann, Renata Moraes ;
Malmstrom, Theodore K. ;
Gonzalez, Maria Cristina .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2016, 17 (12) :1136-1141
[5]   Assessment of muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance in clinical practice: An international survey [J].
Bruyere, O. ;
Beaudart, C. ;
Reginster, J. -Y. ;
Buckinx, F. ;
Schoene, D. ;
Hirani, V. ;
Cooper, C. ;
Kanis, J. A. ;
Rizzoli, R. ;
McCloskey, E. ;
Cederholm, T. ;
Cruz-Jentoft, A. ;
Freiberger, E. .
EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2016, 7 (03) :243-246
[6]   TT3, a More Practical Indicator for Evaluating the Relationship Between Sarcopenia and Thyroid Hormone in the Euthyroid Elderly Compared with FT3 [Letter] [J].
Sun, Jingxia ;
Huang, Jianhao ;
Lu, Wensheng .
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2023, 18 :1361-1362
[7]   Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis [J].
Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J. ;
Bahat, Gulistan ;
Bauer, Juergen ;
Boirie, Yves ;
Bruyere, Olivier ;
Cederholm, Tommy ;
Cooper, Cyrus ;
Landi, Francesco ;
Rolland, Yves ;
Sayer, Avan Aihie ;
Schneider, Stephane M. ;
Sieber, Cornel C. ;
Topinkova, Eva ;
Vandewoude, Maurits ;
Visser, Marjolein ;
Zamboni, Mauro .
AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48 (01) :16-31
[8]   Comparing SARC-F with SARC-CalF for screening sarcopenia in advanced cancer patients [J].
Fu, Xiaofen ;
Tian, Zhen ;
Thapa, Sudip ;
Sun, Huihui ;
Wen, Su ;
Xiong, Huihua ;
Yu, Shiying .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2020, 39 (11) :3337-3345
[9]   Effect of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes following digestive carcinoma surgery: a meta-analysis [J].
Hua, Hongxia ;
Xu, Xinyi ;
Tang, Yu ;
Ren, Ziqi ;
Xu, Qin ;
Chen, Li .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (07) :2385-2394
[10]   Development of a simple screening test for sarcopenia in older adults [J].
Ishii, Shinya ;
Tanaka, Tomoki ;
Shibasaki, Koji ;
Ouchi, Yasuyoshi ;
Kikutani, Takeshi ;
Higashiguchi, Takashi ;
Obuchi, Shuichi P. ;
Ishikawa-Takata, Kazuko ;
Hirano, Hirohiko ;
Kawai, Hisashi ;
Tsuji, Tetsuo ;
Iijima, Katsuya .
GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 14 :93-101